Tldr we want a static website that will last a long time and also look pretty nice.

Right now, we have a wordpress website. It looks very nice. It also have 4 extensions that aren’t configured to auto update. Also whenever I try to make changes to the website they don’t apply because the website was configured via the extensions and I hate it.

I want a static site of some kind. It’s simple to self host or host anywhere, and it’s also simple to secure and keep maintained for a long time.

I am currently looking at static site generators, like quarto, or docusaurus

However, they are difficult to theme to the “niceness” that I want, and their nature results in these somewhat fixed output formats. Like, it is somewhat difficult and annoying to put images anywhere I want them and etc.

Is there like a fixed WYSIWYG html editor? Something between designing a website from scratch and a static site generator. Or is there a way to finagle static site generators to be more flexible than blogs or documentation sites?

  • eagerbargain3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    yeah i was also using hugo and free hosting with github pages, I recommend Hugo or Jekyl as you can host for free in a github repo.

    but think twice, the internet is dying, people use social network 5 to 10h a day, dont read blogs and use AI chat more and more. A blog yes but maybe not public anymore, you feed tons of AI Bots and you compete against AI generated blog and avatar.

    this page list a lot more issues https://www.waltercedric.com/posts/leaving/

    Good luck!

  • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    If you want something boring, use a static site generator like Hugo. But you already said you found them restrictive

    I built my previous site with Ruby Mustache, an extremely simple templating thing. But I abandoned it because it got hard to maintain.

    My current site is plain HTML and CSS. This is the way if you want ultimate customizability. It works pretty good and I would recommend it. Simpler is better.

    Remember: Having a website was one of the ways people communicated on the net back in the day. HTML and CSS are intended to be used by regular people, they are very easy to learn. Don’t be scared of them

    There is no decent WYSIWYG html editor i know of

    My site

    Git repo for my current site

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So great, signed your guestbook!

      Random question, why is index.html just a pointer to home.html?

  • fozid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It depends what you mean by nice and how complex it is? I built my own site which is basically my front end access to all the services I host. I wrote it extremely basically in html and got just the very basic context of what I wanted setup. Then I put the whole thing into Claude, and asked it to tidy it up. Then I started a new Claude session and put the whole thing in again and asked it to modernise it. Then did the same again but asked it to improve it. After about 5 or 6 run thoughts, I was happy with it. But it only has 2 pages, the first main page for anybody, and the 2nd admin page password protected just for me.

  • rune@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Static site generators. Jekyll, Hugo, etc. Pick a template, write in markdown.

  • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would recommend learning basic HTML CSS and making a website without external tools. This way the maintenance cost is 0 as your website will likely work forever.

    Write all your HTML first then your CSS, it will be easier this way. Use vanilla JS if you need to but avoid external libraries , same for php.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      To add to this a bit, if the site is just a single page that will be fine. If your site has a bunch of pages that all need to share the same theme and headers and footers and such it may be worth learning a simple templating system that runs before the site is sent for hosting.

      That way if you need to update something in the design or theme you can do it once, rather than on dozens of pages.

      Personally I use eleventy for my little site.

      https://www.11ty.dev/

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    You dont say what kind of website it is, just not blog or documentation style.

    But SSGs can be skinned a bunch if different ways, and have been set up for a bunch of different purposes.

    https://github.com/myles/awesome-static-generators

    I have been using Zola for myself lately, its less blog post and more article oriented, but still doc heavy. I like the duckquill theme (with… More than a few changes, but still), which I doubt fits what you want. For comparison, here is duckquill: https://duckquill.daudix.one/

    But you may like the Portio theme: https://quentin-rodriguez.github.io/portio-zola/

    If you don’t need to update often though, I think some basic html could be the way to go rather than using an ssg.

  • K3CAN@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Nice” is entirely subjective. I think my site is nice, but someone else might think it’s garbage.

    I use Hugo to generate my site. It’s not wysiwyg, but it supports markdown for pages, which is even simpler than html. It also has a live server mode, where you can see changes immediately.

    The community has a created whole gallery of themes (templates) that you can use. It might be worth looking through the gallery to see if you think any of them look “nice” to you.

  • nomecks@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Put it in an AWS S3 bucket and enable static website hosting. Use Claude to spit out a full site. Warning: The site will look like 1 million other Claude generated sites.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wordpress to static, i like gutenberg, there are prob many easier ways for a static web page. IK runtipis appstore has a few.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    IP Internet Protocol
    SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
    TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 8 acronyms.

    [Thread #39 for this comm, first seen 28th Jan 2026, 12:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]