I’ve some questions about Ghidra released by NSA on Github. And research about it then saw a ycombinator thread for it. That answer was clever and funny.

As title marked, you really okay for just “open source” to trust it?

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    41·
    2 days ago

    Ghidra is used by the best and brightest malware inspectors.

    Can you prove your claim?

    If it was backdoored, it would have been discovered almost immediately.

    That’s the hope. Reality is, these things still happen. Remember that even the extremely secure Linux Kernel was almost, if it was not discovered accidentally and looked into it, hit bey huge backdoor. What makes you so sure that Ghidra developers and inspectors is on the same level?

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      9·
      2 days ago

      Go to any cyber security conference. Check out the CTF teams, Ghidra is used everywhere.

      Can you prove that there is a backdoor? Remember that it is freely available, and if China, Russia, NK or any other nation state could find a backdoor, they would be shouting it from the rooftops to shame the US.

      I dont doubt that the NSA could have seeded a backdoor in an open source project, but I very much doubt they would sign their name to it…

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        12·
        2 days ago

        Can you prove that there is a backdoor?

        I didn’t say there is, I only ask for proofing your point. Remember: Not able to find anything is not the proof of absence. You can only proof something you can find. All I am saying is, if even Linux Kernel ALMOST got hid by a backdoor that was extremely sophisticated, it could happen to Ghidra as well. I’m not saying Ghidra is unsecure or anything like that.

        if China, Russia, NK or any other nation state could find a backdoor

        Then they would most likely use it to their advantage without telling anyone. Shaming a nation is not as lucrative like abusing a backdoor.

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          2·
          2 days ago

          Only true if they can abuse the backdoor, if its tied to NSA infrastructure (which a competent backdoor would be), they couldn’t use it. There is also precedence, the Germans didnt hesitate to publicise that Angela Merkel’s phone was hacked, they could have used the malware to feed false information instead. Stuxnet was exposed to embarrass the US/Israel.

          Cyber security companies would also have no qualms about publicising it. Finding a NSA backdoor would put them on the map, and they have no use for a backdoor.

          • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml
            3·
            2 days ago

            Also just want to add to your points that the NSA didn’t have to admit they developed this. Putting their name to it basically guaranteed that everyone would pour through the code and assume the worst. So it get hyper scrutinzed. So if they had wanted to put a back door in it they would have released it without saying they made it.