

Damn. Imagine shilling for big AI companies because you gain something. Those companies stole from people to sell it. Where are your principles?


Damn. Imagine shilling for big AI companies because you gain something. Those companies stole from people to sell it. Where are your principles?


Maybe edit posts instead to garbage. They don’t know and it can mess up AI training.


Most products.
Hopefully it paves the way to Unreal Engine. Unity sucks worse and while Godot is great, UE has advantages in many ways when building games.
Plus competition can only help. Steam taking a 30% cut is very significant and can really impact on Indie developers.


Maybe Linux usage is starting to affect corporate decisions. Good stuff.


When you say it like that, I see it. It can handle Soda and is adaptive. Worthy of the v62 label!
Well ackshually…


All because they throw it into b2b with teams and ado and windows and whatever other shit they call software.


Ml will usually consider fresh moderation requests on unmodded communities. It can probably be recovered. You can always redirect users to active sub if not.


Got a complaint that this is an ad. We don’t really have a rule against that and I’d assume in an open source community, sharing repos and projects is part of it. There is a repo link.
I’ll allow it. Discuss as you will.
If you enable overlay, does it work?
Did it ever work? If so, when did it break?
Its cool here. I find out most stuff I find important. Obviously it isn’t as big or active as reddit, but it’s real. If you expect it to be reddit, you could be disappointed. If you’re open to new interactions with real, engaged people. It’s fantastic.


Source available fails on principles of open source. Such as the right to modify and distribute.


Yeah. That got me too. A full stop doesn’t hurt.


Ip address, I’d assume.
Probably fingerprint.


Is GTFS short for Get The Fucking Schedule?
I want it to be true.


Like?
Heroic doesn’t work in all cases. I have to have both installed to use my library.
I’ve had many issues with other software and ended up having to use Lutris.
Lutris may have bad code, but functionally mature is generally what succeeds. Sexy code that doesn’t work exists on a handful of computers only.
There is a reason we are talking about it. Its the most popular Linux launcher. Wishing that wasn’t true doesn’t change the fact it is.


I watched. He used a prompt with exact wording from an example and obviously it’s the most logical continuation, so AI would generated it. We know how they’re trained. But how many open source prompts will start with exact code and comment? Unlikely to ever happen in real world. So unlikely to he direct infringement. Someone could easily sue the AI companies with these examples to prove it infringes copywrite work, but then govs are going to protect them so it won’t happen.
It’s unlikely to get identical output without intention, but it’ll also take the infringed actively taking steps to sue that case. Stastical likelihood of this happening in real world is low.
I’m with you in wanting to watch the AI industry collapse. But I’m unfortunately in a minority without the lobbying power, so it won’t happen.


But there was attribution, so you can easily check out commit before attribution was removed, use git blame on class attribution to see when it started, and fork before it.


They can. They just need to find the first instance of AI, branch from the commit before and start with that as a basis for master. Then push that branch to their own remote.
If someone cannot do that, they probably aren’t competent enough to maintain a project of this importance. They can then cherry pick commits that are good and merge those. Or request others recreate new PRS with them with correct attribution. It’s tedious, but easy.
Maintainership isn’t fun. The hardest problem is finding someone that cares enough to take it on. Many would give advice if someone was willing.
Sounds like Lutris dev was burnt out, so it would probably quickly replace it.
You don’t do open source software?
Do you understand open source licenses?
A big premise of that is attributation. If you don’t give appropriate credit, you’re in breach of license. The code AI used didn’t allow it to be distributed without it. They stole from that person.
We’re talking about the worker, not the bourgeoisie. Their labour was exploited to benefit a corporate entity. And you’re consuming stolen proceeds from the bourgeoisie and defending their contributions.