If you enable overlay, does it work?
Did it ever work? If so, when did it break?
If you enable overlay, does it work?
Did it ever work? If so, when did it break?
Its cool here. I find out most stuff I find important. Obviously it isn’t as big or active as reddit, but it’s real. If you expect it to be reddit, you could be disappointed. If you’re open to new interactions with real, engaged people. It’s fantastic.


Source available fails on principles of open source. Such as the right to modify and distribute.


Yeah. That got me too. A full stop doesn’t hurt.


Ip address, I’d assume.
Probably fingerprint.


Is GTFS short for Get The Fucking Schedule?
I want it to be true.


Like?
Heroic doesn’t work in all cases. I have to have both installed to use my library.
I’ve had many issues with other software and ended up having to use Lutris.
Lutris may have bad code, but functionally mature is generally what succeeds. Sexy code that doesn’t work exists on a handful of computers only.
There is a reason we are talking about it. Its the most popular Linux launcher. Wishing that wasn’t true doesn’t change the fact it is.


I watched. He used a prompt with exact wording from an example and obviously it’s the most logical continuation, so AI would generated it. We know how they’re trained. But how many open source prompts will start with exact code and comment? Unlikely to ever happen in real world. So unlikely to he direct infringement. Someone could easily sue the AI companies with these examples to prove it infringes copywrite work, but then govs are going to protect them so it won’t happen.
It’s unlikely to get identical output without intention, but it’ll also take the infringed actively taking steps to sue that case. Stastical likelihood of this happening in real world is low.
I’m with you in wanting to watch the AI industry collapse. But I’m unfortunately in a minority without the lobbying power, so it won’t happen.


But there was attribution, so you can easily check out commit before attribution was removed, use git blame on class attribution to see when it started, and fork before it.


They can. They just need to find the first instance of AI, branch from the commit before and start with that as a basis for master. Then push that branch to their own remote.
If someone cannot do that, they probably aren’t competent enough to maintain a project of this importance. They can then cherry pick commits that are good and merge those. Or request others recreate new PRS with them with correct attribution. It’s tedious, but easy.
Maintainership isn’t fun. The hardest problem is finding someone that cares enough to take it on. Many would give advice if someone was willing.
Sounds like Lutris dev was burnt out, so it would probably quickly replace it.


I think you misrepresented it. Lemmy dev says it needs to be declared and AI is useful for some operations but it must pass review.
I don’t use AI, and think the code is crap, but assisted is different when in skilled hands.
The only issue here is your absolute no vs lemmy’s pragmatic no unless used as a tool in small instances. There are better hills to die on than this and you’ll just lose support for whatever objective you have.


China? Silk Road dude was distracted by 2 enforcement offices while several arrested and grabbed the laptop. If you’re doing things that draw that level of resourcing, that’s on you. I don’t think any civilian had a 9 person heist for a laptop in China… Unless you have a reference… But I doubt it…


Appreciate the feedback.
I’ve seen it one other time. If you see it again, feel free to report it. It definitely helps get visibility of it.
Plus, probably filters out low value contributions. People on Codeberg are generally genuinely interested in a project and not chasing activity graphs/clout/CV padding.


I got reports on this. I’m personally not of a mind to remove it, but it does feel irrelevant to open source. It’s more a Linux sysadmin type thing.
I will say, cut down the spam. Any repeated similar musings within a week would be low value and I’d probably remove.
I personally don’t agree with your points and this wouldn’t be relevant to most peoples risk profile.
Worth reflecting on what others have said here. I think you’re worrying too much about something that will never be expolitable in standard usage and this is from someone who worries a lot about privacy.
Maybe if this is really important to you check out Tails OS which as far as I’m aware focusses on running in RAM and leaving minimal persistent state.


I cannot use Reddit on my phpme since they blocked Slide. Lemmy is enough for me.
I found Samsung’s struggled after 1.5 years. I’m 3 years in on Pixel 6a. Less bloat really seems to help.
What phone would you recommend privacy wise?


Because you disagree with them, they’re not credible?


A BBC documentary here demonstrates some evidence of what is shown and what occurs is two different things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmId2ZP3h0c
There is evidence that isn’t insinuations and it isn’t American.
Got a complaint that this is an ad. We don’t really have a rule against that and I’d assume in an open source community, sharing repos and projects is part of it. There is a repo link.
I’ll allow it. Discuss as you will.