Organisers clarify award ‘cannot be revoked, shared or transferred’ after Venezuelan opposition leader’s comments

The organisers of the Nobel peace prize have said it “cannot be revoked, shared or transferred” after Venezuela’s opposition leader, María Corina Machado, said she wanted to give her award to Donald Trump.

When Machado was named Nobel laureate in October, it was seen as a snub by the White House, despite Machado rushing to dedicate the prize to the US president and his “decisive support of our cause”.

Trump has made no secret of his strongly held desire to be awarded the Nobel peace prize, the winner of which is selected by an independent five-person committee in Oslo.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I don’t see what’s the problem with that.

    It’s not as if, after giving one to Kissinger, the nobel peace prize is anything more than a bitch to political propaganda.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The fact that she offered to share a Peace Prize with that fucking crybaby should earn her a second Peace Prize.

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Remember me again how trump getting the noble peace prize fixes the economy, gets ICE agents off our streets, ends the genocide in Gaza, ends the war in Ukraine, lowers the cost of fuel, food, housing, gets the Epstein files released in full? Oh yea that’s right it doesn’t.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That request from Trump was a “test of spine”.

    Now that he made sure she has none, she will be chewed with the rest.

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Imagine wanting to become president so bad, you promise to give your Nobel prize to the guy who just invaded your country, in the hopes that he will stage a coup for you, but then your plans are suddenly foiled because the Nobel prize committee said no, and that’s a dealbreaker for Trump’s support because he is the most superficial man on the planet. I suppose she can just give him her physical medal, which will make him happy because it’s shiney.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He will also just claim he is now the Nobel laureate, no matter what the committee says, and some time next year he will make it a huge diplomatic incident when he is not added to some official list of laureates.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, I’m surprised that she actually asked the Nobel Comittee about it - just give Trump the medal and shut up whilst he loudly harps about how he has a Nobel Peace Prize.

        It’s not as if that guy cares about objective reality or rules (or even has a fully adult mind) - having the shiny token is more than enough for him to go around showing it and saying he has a Nobel Peace Prize.

        The most logical option for her is just giving the medal to Trump, telling him he now has a Nobel Peace Prize and letting his infantile mind twist that into him feeling like a Nobel Peace Prize recipient.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah the way the media works these days, it doesn’t matter what the committee says. If she says she gave it to him and he says he’s the new winner, than that’s all that most people will ever hear about.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I will give him my Nobel prize too if he stops invading (and threatening to invade) countries and finally stops that one russian invasion. It’s really shiny!!

    • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      From her perspective it’s the correct move. To gain back control of the country a Nobel prize will not be helpful, American support will.

      This would get the democratically elected government in charge, instead of Maduros cronies.

      If the American president is that easy to bribe, that’s a problem for the US. She’s just playing by the new rules.

      America shouldn’t be anywhere near Venezuela, but if you get handed a Deus ex machina, you take it.

      • Chaotic_Altruist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I totally agree that’s how it looks for her. It’s an example of a prisoners dilemma.

        Short term it’s best to just make trump happy and try to salvage sanity from the bullshit.

        Long term though, she’s just validating all the bullshit trump is doing, adding to his power, and telling him that if he screams loud enough he will always eventually get his way. Trump will be a worse person, Venezuela will be a temporary reprieve and then be worse off, and the whole world has a larger mess to clean up.

        World would be so much better if people didn’t fall prey to prisoners dilemmas and actually made the best long term decision for everyone every time. Might be getting too late to ever see that world tbh.

        Bottom line is nobody should be feeding the orange infant.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          More in general, “American support” isn’t necessarily a positive thing in the mid or long term, especially in Latin America and even more in the present age when Fascism is normalized in American and Fascists get elected to lead the US.

          For her it risks being like a drowning person getting a nose to put around her neck to be pulled out of the water.

      • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Except no she doesn’t care about Venezuelans if she did she wouldn’t cheer on their bombing and blockading and promise to hand over all resources to America.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      it’s incredibly shameful how these oposition figures are so quick to give away their country to the Orange Pedo for a shot at the presidency… not a thought about the Venezuelan people

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not spineless greedy and imperialist she is not giving in to demands she has long advocated for turning all Venezuelan resources over to American companies.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Eh, I could see it as a reasonable deal from her perspective. If giving Trump a pointless shiny metal disk got him to actually back democratic reform in Venezuela, sure, give him the shiny metal disk. Whatever, it’s just a thing.

      Unfortunately it wouldn’t work, though; Trump never sticks to his deals after he’s got what he wanted out of them or when he sees an opportunity to squeeze even more out of you. So might as well keep the shiny metal disk.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, she believes in her cause far more than a shiny metal disk, which if given up the rest of the world will know what happened. Not like she was motivated by it, and it’s the only card she really has when dealing with the US military. Certainly not worth calling her a spineless… That.

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    19 hours ago

    To the Norwegian Nobel Committee

    I hereby humbly suggest that the Peace Prize for 1939 is awarded the German Chancellor and Führer Adolf Hitler, a man, who in the opinion of millions of people, is a man who more than anyone in the world has deserved this highly respected reward. Authentic documents reveal that in September 1938 world peace was in great danger; it was only a matter of hours before a new European war could break out. The man who during this dangerous time saved our part of the world from this terrible catastrophe was without no doubt the great leader of the German people. In the critical moment he voluntarily did not let weapons speak although he had the power to start a world war.

    By his glowing love for peace, earlier documented in his famous book Mein Kampf – next to the Bible perhaps the best and most popular piece of literature in the world - together with his peaceful achievement – the annexation of Austria-Adolf Hitler has avoided the use of force by freeing his countrymen in Sudetenland and making his fatherland big and powerful. Probably Hitler will, if unmolested and left in peace by war mongers, pacify Europe and possibly the whole world.

    Sadly there still are a great number of people who fail to see the greatness in Adolf Hitler´s struggle for peace. Based on this fact I would not have found the time right to nominate Hitler as a candidate to the Nobel Peace Prize had it not been for a number of Swedish parliamentarians who have nominated another candidate, namely the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. This nomination seems to be poorly thought. Although it is true that Chamberlain through his generous understanding of Hitler´s struggle for pacification has contributed to the saving of world peace, the last decision was Hitler´s and not Chamberlains! Hitler and no one else is first and foremost to be thanked for the peace which still prevails in the greater part of Europe; and this man is also the hope for peace in the future.

    As Chamberlains obviously can claim his share of the peace making, he could possibly have a smaller part of the Peace Prize. But the most correct thing to do is not to put another name beside the name of Adolf Hitler and thereby throwing a shadow on him. Adolf Hitler is by all means the authentic God-given fighter for peace, and millions of people all over the world put their hopes in him as the Prince of Peace on earth.

    Stockholm, January 27, 1939

  • vegeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just found out and believe me, people are VERY upset that the Nobel Peace Prize is NOT transferable. Amazing. After all the peace, the deals, the HISTORIC calm (tremendous calm, many people are saying THE MOST CALM IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD), they say ‘sorry, rules are rules.’ Meanwhile Obama gets one for showing up. Didn’t even DO ANYTHING! I finished wars, avoided wars, brought about peace very strongly — NO PRIZE. If it were transferable (like common sense says it should be), they’d be sending it over immediately. Very unfair system, very political, very Scandinavian. RIGGED! SAD! I should have a prize for each of the 8 WARS I SOLVED. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!

    -@RealDonaldTrump