Victim of Communism

  • 41 Posts
  • 1.23K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Outside places like the US, UK and Canada the whole “lets talk about Identity Politics instead of Wealth Inequality” “liberal” propaganda technique to disguise their authoritarian pro-Oligarch ways didn’t really took hold anywhere as much.

    I gotta disagree. This technique is baked into the entire Western political landscape. It’s particularly glaring in France and Germany, where neo-nazi police get to march around pushing the faces of poor immigrants, students, and socialist activists into the dirt in the name of “fighting antisemitism”. But it shows up throughout Latin America, the Philippines, and even West Africa.

    State media sponsored tribalization, accusations of foreign infiltration of the opposition parties, and mass arrests of economic dissidents on ostensibly liberal “race neutral” grounds are common strategies globally, and for good reason. Even Russia plays this game when it suits them, with “De-Nazification” as a code word for busting the heads of any United Russia opposition group.

    Even though - in my experience - the posh deceit discourse techniques have migrated from the US and UK towards other European countries, even the mainstream old center-left parties (which are now Neoliberal and well to the right of center) haven’t adopted the heavy identitarian discourse you see in their supposed equivalents in the US and UK.

    I mean, you have straight-up breakaway regions in Spain, Italy, Greece, and - famously - Ukraine. Hell, nobody swings the identitarian cudgel harder than the liberal Zionists of Israel. Identity politics allows you to pretend at liberal politics while enabling a fascist state, by insisting the fascism is a bullwark against the opposition party’s Bigger Scarier Fascism. So you get guys like Olaf Schultz and Emanual Macron introducing whole new levels of state surveillance, crack downs on immigration, and gutting of educational institutions under the pastiche of some liberal cause (typically LGBTQ or philosemitism). And if you run over a bunch of queer folks and left-jews along the way? All the better.

    Outside Europe, you often see the Drug War and violence against indigenous people spun as some kind of beneficent social welfare response or “tough love” effort to reduce poverty. But these guys love to code their behaviors in liberal terms, suggest there’s some kind of White Man’s Burden to step onin and “help”, and be greeted as liberators when you do.


  • Crackdowns in Hong Kong and the arrests of prodemocracy movements ain’t peaceful, bruv

    The “crackdowns” were in response to a riot kicked off by Hong Kong residents protesting China’s extradition of a Taiwanese fugitive back to Taiwan for an alleged murderer. The only people killed in the “crackdowns” were Hong Kong police, at the hands of the rioters. The end result of the riots was to poison the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong as an American propaganda campaign and coup attempt.

    You liberals got played. Again.



















  • The 22-year-old Ukrainian builder had been weaponised to target the UK’s head of government. But by who?

    The handler EL, who directed Lavrynovych, offered Russian citizenship in return for other attacks and glorified President Vladimir Putin, messages the BBC has uncovered show.

    We have identified evidence suggesting that EL is a young Russian diplomat, schooled in information warfare by spies and propagandists, who is close to the highest levels of power in Moscow. His name is Evgeny Lyukshin. He is 23 and the son of a senior official.

    It’s plausible. Russian intelligence services have adopted the same basic tactics used by the CIA, the FBI, SIS, Mossad, and similar services to cultivate extremists as tools of regime change.

    And we’ve got a wealth of evidence to support the theory that these agencies use the Internet as a vector of that radicalization.

    Whether you believe the BBC (an organ of state media) when it pins the blame on one spy agency over another? I guess that depends on how much you trust them.