

What I said was that Europe would prefer that Russia attack it rather than Ukraine.
That’s an insane thing to say, both on it’s face and based on the last four years of Europeans very strategically avoiding direct confrontation with Russia.
Then the combined forces of Europe would be able to defeat Russia.
Napoleon on line 1. Hitler on line 2. They are both eager to discuss what you have in mind.
The UK and France gave Hitler the Sudetenland
It wasn’t theirs to give. The Sudetenland is in Czechoslovakia, a country that didn’t even exist until 1918. It was full of Austro-Hungarians who were some of the first foreigners to explicitly align with Nazi Germany.
The UK and France weren’t in a position to stop him, any more than they were in a position to stop the proto-fascist war hero Gabriele Annunzio and a rogue force of Italian mutineers from seizing the Adriatic port city of Fiume in 1919.
Might as well claim Obama gave Putin Crimea. Or that Bush gave him South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
The Donbus had similar problems. It was populated by a large number of Russian nationals who were getting propaganda pumped into their brains from across the border. That was kicking off domestic insurgency, which Ukrainian nationalists were eager to squash.
Europeans had neither skin in the game nor influence in the region. All they were willing to do is send mercenaries and cheap military equipment over the border. And we know how that worked out.
Nobody wanted an all out war with Russia.




I didn’t think you said that. I think Ukraine is the obvious fly paper in the analogy. Europe very clearly is not, nor does anyone outside of the continent wish that on themselves.
That’s historical revisionism.
They had no capacity to keep Germans out of Europe. This wasn’t a choice they were making, it was an excuse for their impotency.