For a while I was hiring people in a nearby country, and despite advertising it as daytime office hours only, the majority of applicants would ask if they could work nights instead because they already had a job during the day that wouldn’t give them overtime.
People seeding obscure shit is what makes the whole thing viable. Keep up the good work.
Fuck Joanne Rowling in particular, BUT, I don’t think this particular post is a good example given what it’s actually saying…
Corbyn was laid low by trumped-up accusations of anti-semitism, it would be ironic if the press did the same to AB for (supposedly) taking the opposite side.
I’m somewhat suspicious of the way the Guardian didn’t actually publish the interview itself, but just their journalist’s writeup of it. We’re not told what the question he answered actually was, just what it was “about”, and then the headline writers of the outlets quoting that quote take it a step further into implying that he’s a full-on genocide denier.
Require an AI SLOP disclosure.
No advertising bot is going to admit to it. The only people for whom failure to jump this hoop will be a blocker, are legit posters.
I’ve been seeing headlines like this for as long as Trump has been in politics. This is one Reddit poster, nothing to see here.
A Russian drone hit an apartment building in Romania, a NATO member state, sparking outrage across Europe, where nations have ramped up defense efforts against Moscow. The explosives-packed aircraft was ostensibly bound for nearby Ukraine, but crossed into a Romanian town near the two countries’ border.
Of the five posts I’ve seen so far on social media on this topic, this is the only one to give some sense of what actually happened.
$NATO anyone?
I wouldn’t say they’re too good, but the kind of mistakes they make are different to this one.
Remember, when they say something obviously untrue, it’s not because they think you’ll believe it, it’s because they need it to be true in order to justify what they’re going to do next.
[] Leo said. "He revealed the gentle face of God, who always rejects violence.
I think my Bible might be faulty
Yeah removing it is the first good decision they’ve made in years. It was a flaming garbage heap on multiple levels that bubbled the most awful stuff to the front page that was blatantly gamed by bad actors.
Edit: are these downvotes because I’m wrong, or because people skim-read it and kneejerk reacted to “reddit did a good thing”?
Somehow it’s still set in the present day, present time.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
My beef with the title is that it scans like he’s trying to downplay the risk of AI altogether. CEO of Mistral AI says the “real risk of artificial intelligence is that of massive influence” is more aligned with the message he seems to have been actually trying to convey.
Thanks for doing your best to highlight the important part in bold, but I still can’t get over how misleading the headline is.
Today (Shrove Tuesday) is Pancake Day in many countries. IHOP in the Philippines closes their branches that day due to it being a holiday there. Their manager is the most incompetent marketer in the world for not even attempting to make Pancake Day a thing in the Philippines.
What Thatcher taught us was that it’s acceptable for women to be in charge as long as they’re overtly callous.
That photo makes me feel old - I remember when Kim Jong Un looked young and stupid, now he looks old and stupid
Of course if it isn’t a war, then assassinating their head of state was super illegal.