Donald Trump has asked for at least $100bn (£75bn) in oil industry spending for Venezuela, but received a lukewarm response at the White House as one executive warned the South American country was currently “uninvestable”.

Bosses of the biggest US oil firms who attended the meeting acknowledged that Venezuela, sitting on vast energy reserves, represented an enticing opportunity.

But they said significant changes would be needed to make the region an attractive investment. No major financial commitments were immediately forthcoming.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Whaaaaaaaat? Dragging the dirtiest type of oil out of the ground from a country still resisting invasion isn’t going to be cost effective?

  • bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    The gist wasn’t that he didn’t want to invest. It was that he can’t invest until Trump “fixes” problems with the country. Like its leadership and laws, etc.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So when he was on air force one and said that he’d spoken to the oil companies before the invasion. That was obviously a lie.

    Is brain really is mush isn’t it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      He’s so bad at business that he doesn’t realise that companies won’t want to oversaturate the market and lower their margins. This is a concept of 12-year-old should be able to understand.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yeah, this is why every article that mentions Venezuelas huge oil reserves needs to also mention it is the costliest/ lowest margin oil too. Not all oil reserves are the same, the Saudis being able to pull a barrel out for $15 and sell it for $80 is a way different position then Venezuela pulling a barrel out for $60 and selling it for $70.

    It is probably just part of the media manufacturing consent for regime change: “look how resource rich Venezuela is and how poor the people are, it must be because the evil Maduro regime” completely ignoring sanctions. Yeah mismanagement is part of the reason Venezuela is doing poorly but even if they were run perfectly with no corruption they still wouldn’t be living like the Saudis.

    • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yep. Canada’s tar sands are similar. Low grade tar that can be sold for cheap or upgraded for profit. Either way though even without counting labour standards and wages it costs twice as much to pull it out of the ground and we’ll sell it for half as much

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Sure, invest $100bn into an unstable country chasing a dying technology at the behest of a corrupt regime. Even for oil companies, Venezuela is too hot to touch.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not to mention there’s a solid chance the next president will basically dedicate their career to undoing Trump’s BS, so there’s no guarantee you’ll get more than a few years of revenue.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Even if Trump hangs around as a dictator there’s still no point investing in Venezuela. It’s not as if there is even a global oil shortage so why would you want to build more infrastructure.

        • bbboi@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Trump is looking at fighting a war in Venezuela, Greenland and at home. How could anybody possibly think this regime is ever going to be anything near stable?

          • bbboi@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            Holy crap, did you invent sarcasm? I’ve never heard anybody say anything like this before.

        • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Judging from the anger over ICE and anti-american administration if Trump tries to stop the election there will be riots and strikes.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I lost count of the many “if x happens we’ll act” excuses…

          • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I have yet to see any evidence that Trump doing anything would cause riots and strikes. The American people are too pacified to defend themselves.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              We’ve already had a few riots.

              Technically we’ve also had Jan 6th, but I know that’s not what you mean.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Unfortunately that doesnt change what @drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com is concerned about, specifically when we take the executive order that marks nonexistent organizations and basic political beliefs as “terrorist organizations”.

            Which can be applied to both groups. So it comes down to the response to that - and we know how ICE is being used and how they are trying to use the NG.

            My fear is that this is going to get extremely bloody. Elections won’t matter at that point, even if they were held.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          “now is a time for healing so we are going to hold no one accountable and in a few years when the fascist are back we can do this again”

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It goes beyond that. Venezuela’s oil is heavy crude(if I understood correctly) which is difficult to process and requires specialized refineries in which US oil companies have not invested in.

      EDIT: See comments below for corrections and more context.

      • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A few months ago Trumpist billionaire Paul Singer bought Citgo, the former U.S.-based arm of Venezuela’s state-run oil company. Citgo owns three Gulf Coast refineries custom-built to process Venezuelan crude, refineries that have suffered from the U.S. embargo on imports of that crude. If Trump lifts that embargo, Singer will receive a huge windfall. But this windfall will have nothing to do with reviving Venezuelan production.

        https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/the-emperors-new-oil-wealth

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s largely the same as Canadian and Mexican oil, so the infrastructure is very much in place.

        It gives Trump an opening to pressure/annex Canada and Mexico, if Venezuela can make up the difference (which they can’t, yet).

        • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          It’s true that the infrastructure is already in place but it is important to understand that it is not simple infrastructure, and with a few exceptions, it is already pretty much fully utilized by Canadian and Mexican heavy crude/bitumen so it’s not like they can just double their capacity and start processing Venezuela too. You’re right about giving an opening to pressure Canada/Mexico though.

          But it’s questionable if there’s really much upside for the US on the financial side. The opportunity to pressure is definitely there, but more pressure isn’t going to get blood out of a stone. Venezuelan oil will still have costs associated with it, and Canadian and Mexican oil is already really cheap.

          The oil itself may be essentially free the way they’re stealing it with military force, but It’s not going to be cheap to build up Venezuela’s production infrastructure and it’s not going to be cheap to transport the oil stateside, and both Mexico and Canada already have all that infrastructure in place too, and already give a huge discount to the US since they have nowhere else to affordably sell or refine their oil as they have effectively no indigenous refining capacity for heavy crude and few other export options. During a few of the oil price plummets around Covid, Canadian oil (Western Canadian Select) was actually selling for negative prices, Canada was paying the US to take it off their hands and refine it for them. With global oil prices already trending relatively low, it’s going to be hard for oil from Venezuela to realistically compete with situations like that.

          The most believable explanation that I’ve heard is that this is not really about directly stealing Venezuela’s oil reserves as much as it is about denying it to Russia and China, and maybe securing them in case of some future conflict. And that, I think, makes an awful lot of sense geopolitically as distasteful as I personally find the whole affair.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            So: very specialized, expensive equipment in a small number of locations. What could go wrong?

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      While I’m not saying our oil dependency is good, calling it a dying technology is a bit silly. Even electric cars have lots of oil in them, nevermind the phone this is being typed from or my carpets or any other number of daily items. I do wonder if some of the unrest around the world these days is partially out of a fear that theres only so much oil…

      • CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        An article i read states that with China and India fully investing into EV technologies, we could see oil demand peak in 2030 and:

        “The tragedy is that we’re fighting over barrels that look huge on spreadsheets but shrink rapidly when confronted with physics, economics and time,” said Guy Prince, the head of energy supply research at the thinktank.

      • GardenGeek@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        While this is true most oil is used as fuel not as material isn’t it? Given that the world opts out of oil as fuel there would still be a massive oversupply for the remaining use. Prices would probably come down a lot making exploration of new fields unprofitable in the near future or am I missing something?

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes, only 10-15% of oil is used for non-fuel purposes. That is a dramatic reduction in demand.

          Also, much of our technology has been built around oil due to byproduct availability. We could, in theory, create all the products we use without oil. It would definitely take time, research, and retooling though.

          • innermachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            Yea that’s about what I’ve seen 15 or so % toward plastic, then another 10-20% is used for heating purposes (think home heating oil, kerosene etc) not saying we can’t get away from it but for example I’d have to completely redo my home heating system to even think about getting away from using nearly 600 gallons of oil for heat a winter, which for reference I use 40 gallons of gas a month to get to work in my car (significantly less on the bike, but it’s a snow globe out there rn) and it takes about a half gal of oil to make a gal of gas. Most of my annual oil consumption comes from heating my home, not fueling my vehicles to transport me 250 miles a week on average

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              31 minutes ago

              I am in the same boat, I spent $680 on heating oil last month. I would love to move to split-level heat pump system. Most of the work would be running the electrical as the pumps/vents themselves are pretty easy to install.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So basically, it looks like he committed an international crime for oil and then won’t even get the oil. No one should be surprised, I guess. Incompetence is the only constant.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m starting to see how he managed to bankrupt the casino. It’s because he won’t stop committing pointless crimes that don’t in fact benefit him in any way.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The oil execs are saying it’s “uninvestable” precisely because they know how incompetent Trump is.

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This actually sounds more like they want American troops to turn Venezuela into not-Venezuela… THEN they would feel safe investing.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Trump puts troops in Venezuela.

        Oil execs: ya know, it’s mighty difficult to ensure security using only boats, it’d be better if we were in control all the way from the US via land.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I figured it would take a few months before the incompetence would be plain as day and ruin everything, not just one week.

    • TrippingBalls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bailout time… Trump will give them the money to invest and make them whole from previous losses

      You know damn well big oil put him up to this.

      It’s smoke and mirrors

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Trump: anyone want to buy some stereos? They fell of a truck.

    Oil companies: ehh….

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What a fucking doofus Trump is. He couldn’t consider the cost of his actions - and the likely fallout of the same - if his life depended on it.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Counterpoint: All of 20th and 21st American history outside of WWI and WWII. The US never declared war on Iraq or Afghanistan.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Correct. Previous competent State Departments have sent in spooks (CIA) into sovereign countries they are not at war with.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I don’t think so, imo he cares about the economy (maybe because the midterms are coming) previously every time US started a war the price of oil drops and the economy is doing better.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When you account for inflation, oil prices today are in line with oil prices in the early 2000s. The price is too low, and the risk is too high for massive infrastructure spending that would extract more oil from Venezuela to be worth it.

    Possibly, green energy technologies are now on a trajectory to overtake fossil fuels altogether - and they are already a factor in driving the price of fossil fuels (and therefore the profitability of many wells and mines) down substantially. If that happens, the long term value of Venezuela’s oil reserves, without suitable infrastructure already built for extraction, could be close to zero.

    In line with small government ideals, the best thing to do is let companies decide whether and how much to invest, but that won’t be a headline worth showing off. So Trump is trying to make $100B happen, and believes that that (alone) will restore the Venezuelan economy to the way it was.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Trump doesn’t give a rat’s ass about restoring the Venezuelan economy. He’s an extortionist and a robber, not a caring person.

  • Atom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why would they? It’s a win-win. They either get significant tax payer money invested on their behalf, or the oil stays off market keeping their prices high.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Prices aren’t even that high, crude oil’s price has been on a steady downward March since the high in 2022

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        But taking Venezuelan oil offline might help bring global prices up, which would help Russia, which doesn’t turn a profit unless prices are high.

        • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Russia also needs Oil to sell which is becoming hard between Ukraine hitting Russian facilities in Russia and now we have confirmation the US is not exempting the Shadow Fleet from having Russian ties

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This is exactly it, it’s a shakedown and Trump and the party of fiscal responsibility will see to it that yet more corporations get hundreds of billions in government largess. But boy, they sure extracted that 1 bil from PBS, so I guess they’re on point.

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yep the oil in Venezuela is not high grade so it’s not profitable in the short term even if long term control is important for oil based business.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      How is Dorito Benito going to stop the Venezuelans from taking every thing back the minute it’s convenient. He would have to put boots on the ground.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Companies have usually avoided morally dubious actions in worlds spotlight, because it deters investors.

    Not sure if anyone wants to touch Trumps fresh smelly turd… at least directly and visibly.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They also adjustment in the business of throwing away money on PR nightmares…

      The math doesn’t math here. Oil barrel prices are very low, so low they’d be investing billions to lose money operating them