Proud? Nah. Bemused, sure.

You hit Wikipedia and looked up utilitarianism. Cool.

Utilitarianism requires weighing all affected parties, not just the ones harmed. AI-assisted diagnosis in underserved regions. Accessibility tools for people who can’t afford specialists. Climate modelling. Translation breaking language barriers. Medical research leading to a Nobel Prize in Medicine.

“Can’t name a single good thing” isn’t a utilitarian argument. It’s vibes. And it’s prima facie untrue. There’s not much point in citing counter-examples because you’ve already made your mind up. Cf. your post history on Fuck AI.

The warfare point is a military policy conversation, not a ChatGPT one.

The art and skill atrophy concerns are legit. But that’s a “how do we manage this” conversation, not “therefore unethical.”

Note by the way I haven’t personally attacked you or accused you of having Claude’s arm up YOUR ass? That’s called an ad-hominem - look that up in your next wikipedia search.