Avoiding US goods and services – from tech to whisky to air travel – has forced many to find a new way of living
This week the US imposed 50% tariffs on US$20bn (£15bn) of Canadian goods, and Mark Carney, the country’s prime minister, has vowed to match them “dollar for dollar” after the collapse of trade talks between the two countries last weekend. Donald Trump retaliated on Thursday by ordering the federal government to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America.
Such actions have added fuel to a widespread boycott of US products and services by Canadians that began early last year in response to the president’s trade war and threats to annex his northern neighbour.
More than 3,500 people from across Canada shared with the Guardian via an online callout how they have made changes to their lives in response to the US administration’s political and economic stance. Many expressed deep anger and sadness, but remained resolute that this was now a new way of living.
Don’t tell them that, they likely think that they do. They also seem to think a temp job overseas is the same as emigrating.
10 years in-country is a bit different than a temp job. You clearly have never been anywhere. But nice try, trollbot!
Troll bot, ha. you did not work 10 years on the same contract, I do know how at least that much works.
Is working 10 years on the same contract ever desirable? Under which conditions?
Moving to a new nation. Actually most people would like to have job security.
Really though its more about the limits work visas impose that limit the contract lengths of international work.
Isn’t a 1 year work contract enough to get a residence permit in most countries?
I guess it may not be in some countries, but I reckon most of them should be fine with that.
It is unlikely to move to a new country with a 10 years contract, unless you go for a specific highly skilled position.
One year no, most need more. But the real issue is not the one year contract but the one year only contracts like most English teaching jobs. Also as this whole thread of back and forward is about the “if you (americans) don’t like it you can leave” statement this does not work since america is one of only two nations that demand a cut of you income while working outside the states. Meaning you can leave but not really stop being and paying into american.
Moving to a new nation with a family, restricting yourself to a specific job is always going to be difficult; regardless where you are from.
I am aware of the problem with US taxation on foreign income. In fact I know many people who move away from the US while retaining a job in the US. In many places this allows them to mostly only pay taxes in the US.
However, the statement is correct in my opinion: if you don’t like your country you can leave. It is indeed not easy, but definitely possible.
I know plenty of people where I live who came with their whole family without money and without a job, now they have a job and their family living here.
Plenty people moved with one year contracts, plenty people moved with contracts of just a few months, plenty people moved with a tourist visa and then found a job.
I have met people who have done this from many different countries to many different countries. In many cases it was difficult, in others it was simpler.
I know plenty Americans who moved to other countries and live well and were able to fix any bureaucratical problem in-between.
Are you saying that US citizens are impossibilitated to move due to the double taxation? Is that such a huge problem as to make it unfeasible? It surely does not make it easier, but plenty people before you were able to.
Oh and just wanted to check, you are I assume american? I don’t want to make the assumption incorrectly. I am not an american but do know ex pats of american and other nations.
No I am saying if you dislike your nation you can leave in most cases, but the one that is always brought up is the states where no you can’t leave in the same way. Americans can leave but they can’t stop being american so no, if they don’t like it they don’t get to “leave it”. The whole statement does not work the way it does for other nations, americans can’t start a new life else where and leave america behind.
If you where say from new Zealand and for some reason took deep umbrage with the nation you could (with a lot of effort and drive) leave and move to say south Africa. With enough gumption you can get residency and maybe even citizenship. The issue is americans see this process into their nation all the time but seem to miss that they can’t do the same from the states. And the odd part is that this is not a normal thing outside of your rogue states but americans always seem to miss the significance of the difference. Its like the hotel California song, you can check out but never leave.