• Vittelius@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago
    1. The government is obliged to grant your request to leave the country unless there actually is a war.
    2. There is no penalty if you leave the country without government approval.
    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Then what is the point of doing any of thi, oh other than tracking the citizens movements and to set the ball rolling on more draconian shit down the line

      • Vittelius@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Except the provision in question was copy pasted from an old law where it existed for decades without any change.

        I find the tendency on Lemmy to see a conspiracy in every law concerning.

        Criticise the law for what it does (there is enough here for it) and be wary of potential abuse. But sometimes warm water is just warm water.

        • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It existed for decades in times of war and tension.

          It is something completely different that they want us to ask for permission in times of peace, which they changed this year.

    • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The government can and will change that law when they decide it is needed. Just because they are not enforcing it right now doesn’t mean they can’t find you guilty at a later date.

      You should never need permission from the government to travel.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        not enforcing

        Seems like the law doesn’t apply here not that it’s not enforced. If war does come similar law will be passed ether way.

        I’d agree with you though from philosophical pov - the government should never be allowed to contain you even if you’re dodging the draft.

    • somenonewho@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Do you have a source that says the government has to grant your request? I tried scouring the law and it seems true but I struggle with the lingo.

      Also the changes that were last made to the law seem to explicitly differentiate between war and none war situation as to which paragraphs are applied so they could have applied that paragraph only to situations of war. So I still think a Discussion and some scrutiny is warrented here as to why we “kept” this rule.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      In other words, meaningless paperwork just to keep the population disciplined. Germans 🙄.

      • parson0@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Not quite, this particular paragraph was identical in the cold war era but the other paragraphs, mainly defining when it is in effect and when not, were changed. This made the law applicable since January 1st of this year. So previously this rule was only applicable during war or “conflicting times” and now it always is.