• sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is something very important: Don’t focus on aplications (FOSS or not) but on open data formats and proper import/export mechanisms so you can switch applications easily.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      That’s why I use Obsidian! It’s not open source, but all my notes are just… pre-emptively saved as markdown files on disk. If they fuck me over I can just leave and open it in literally any markdown editor 😭

      If they used a proprietary format, I probably just wouldn’t have used them in the first place and would have had to use a shittier alternative.

      • u_tamtam@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You could, I don’t know, use an open source note taking app? I mean, it’s not like obsidian has some unique and unmatched capabilities ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What is a plaintext (non-database) md editor that had wikilinks, LaTeX, back links, tags, PDF export, properties and dataviews, and a plugin community? Plus it needs an android app and desktop app that can be synced (even just via syncthing) seamlessly.

          I am always open for switching!

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            The silence is deafening, because there isn’t a FOSS program that comes close to Obsidian’s functionality. This isn’t the first time I’ve seen someone drop the “lul just use FOSS instead” line to garner upvotes, when literally no FOSS alternative exists. There are some FOSS programs that come close in some regards, but none of them do everything Obsidian does and support multiple platforms.

            Lemmy has an obsession with FOSS (for good reason) but that means many users basically try to act like FOSS vegans. They’d use six different (and largely incompatible) FOSS programs just to scratch the surface of what a closed-source program can do. And their hackles start to raise if you ever point out that there aren’t FOSS alternatives for everything.

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 minutes ago

              The silence of two hours ago lol

              Chill brother. Like i get it, and FOSS advocates should lead with meaningful alternitives first imho, but there definitly seems to be some https://joplinapp.org/

              I personally prefer vscodium and nvim myself for notes but that isnt a one for one comparison to obsidian (in either direction) imho

      • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Same! Them using markdown means I’ve been able to make an Obsidian-like app for Wear OS, with a phone app to sync your vault to the watch. Wouldn’t have been possible if they weren’t using markdown. Hoping to launch it on the Google Play store in a month or so :)

      • lelovsky@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I love obsidian, I wanted to send a donation, but they only sell merch with expensive shipping :<

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          A combination of CommonMark and GitHub Flavored Markdown so it’s compatible with most markdown formatting people are used to. Also supports LaTeX and HTML. (and of course any custom syntax modifications you make with custom CSS or plugins)

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is not a recommendation or a preference, it is a mandate,

    ODF’s mandate is the document-layer expression of that principle, as you cannot claim digital sovereignty while allowing your documents to be locked in proprietary formats controlled by a single vendor.

    incredibly based

  • mogoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    I think this is not (entirely) true. Or at least I have some questions:

    • Is this an enacted law that I missed? Because it looks like it is a work in progress.
    • “All levels of government” Really? We have federalism. I am not sure, if that can be mandated by the governments.

    BTW: https://deutschland-stack.gov.de/

    I have searched a bit further: For federal and state governments, ODF is binding through IT Planning Council resolutions and federal guidelines, but there is no formal law yet mandating its use. Also, this is not binding for local authorities, but virtual it is.

    https://www.it-planungsrat.de/beschluss/beschluss-2025-06

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    At least something good amid all the bad news regarding the future of software systems