Here and there are posts about tailwind losing its revenue stream. And then people / post authors conclude open source is lost and spread FUD.

Do you think your projects die because of LLMs?

I only have public hobby projects, I am not afraid. I also try to donate to a lot of free software that I use or like.

E.g. this https://programming.dev/post/43810907 or https://programming.dev/post/45292081

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Github has gone downhill.

    CodeBerg is really nice, has a free tier, and has guided tutorials for migration.

    I moved my work out of spite for GitHub’s warmongering parent company.

    And then I was pleasantly surprised by how nice CodeBerg is.

    • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      CodeBerg sounds great but this doesn’t seem like a longterm solution. If CodeBerg ends up getting really big then it will get overrun with slop as well. We need to find a way to cut the slop problem off at its source, but I have no idea how that could actually work.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        We need to find a way to cut the slop problem off at its source, but I have no idea how that could actually work.

        Agreed. Stopping giving money to Microsoft seems like a place to start.

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plus, probably filters out low value contributions. People on Codeberg are generally genuinely interested in a project and not chasing activity graphs/clout/CV padding.