• -RJ-@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Why was Farage at a World Leader conference? He doesn’t run any countries? Just another excuse to not be in his constituency I guess.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s not a world leader conference, it’s a meeting of assholes, grifters and criminals, and some of them are also world leaders

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I wasn’t trying to rank them

          There must be 1000s of people that lead a state that aren’t there (given ~200 countries). What makes this guy’s presence so special? Or, perhaps, his presence is also out of place

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            13 hours ago

            California is 2/3 the size of the UK.

            Farage is an MP of a constituency of 75 thousand, and won the election for that position with 21225 votes. He’s not a minister, he’s not an appointed leader of anything, he’s not even the leader (or any official part) of the official opposition in the UK parliament. Hell he’s not even doing a passable job at being an MP given he’s missed like, 70+% of parliamentary meetings, and hasn’t held any significant surgeries in his constituency either. He’s the literal definition of paid for doing nothing politician, shuffling around Fasc-a-Lago hoping to earn some favours by having his nose so far up Trump’s ass he could diagnose the tangerine tyrant’s appendix…

              • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Drop in session/office hours type deal for constituents. Our mps can help citizens (usually by writing strongly worded letters) with small civil matters like planning/building regulations, issues with county council (local government) and so on. It’s also an opportunity for people to lobby their mp about national concerns too.

              • Mike D@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 hours ago

                As a Californian, I really wanted to jump in with the “Fuck Newsom” crowd.

                But California’s economy rivals most countries. Last time I checked there were only five countries with larger economies.

            • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              My grammar is admittedly pretty farm boy, so I thought I’d check. This might be saying the sentence was fine. But either way what your suggesting is nothing like how I hear people speak

              Some authorities prescribe that restrictive relative clauses (where the relative clause is part of the identification of the noun phrase) should only use that as the introductory pronoun, and non-restrictive relative clauses should only use which or who/whom as the introductory pronoun. In practice, either pronoun is commonly used to introduce a restrictive relative clause, including in edited prose. In contrast, it is not usual in edited written English to use that to introduce a non-restrictive relative clause, though there are occasional rare attestations.

              https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/that

              I saw at least one typo there and figured I’d leave it for you