• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2026

help-circle





  • Off the top of my head …

    • free public health care for all.
    • forgive all medical debt
    • free public education for all, including college.
    • forgive all student loan debt
    • universal basic income
    • more public housing. Homes are owned by the people who live in them, or the state. No profit seeking private orgs.
    • close the “buy borrow die” loopholes, where people get untaxed loans to access their wealth without paying taxes
    • more tax on the wealthy
    • look into making property tax progressive like income. That is, the first $nnn of your house is untaxed, the next chunk at some percent, the following chunk at a greater percent, and so on.
    • all Republicans removed from office. They are barred from government positions for life, as well as any private role with decision making power.
    • break up mega corps. Disney, Microsoft, Amazon, etc. Their current leadership has their wealth seized, and they are barred from leadership positions for life.
    • invest heavily in public transit and safety improvements to existing roadways. Cars are literally killing us as well as sapping our resources.
    • mandatory profit sharing for employees.
    • mandatory pay transparency
    • maximum pay gap between roles. No more janitor making $7/HR while the CEO makes $300/hr
    • accounting hijinks to pretend like your org made no profit, or “they’re not employees they’re contractors” are punishable by seizure of all wealth and a prohibition from similar roles for life
    • come up with something so venture capitalist bros aren’t deciding the future, if the above doesn’t somehow fix it.










  • Democrats aren’t especially left, so I’m not sure you can really look at states controlled by the democratic party as a fair comparison. The US doesn’t have much of a left. Many democrats are conservative, especially when its things close to home (eg: nimbyism, “i like black people i just don’t want to live next to one”, etc).

    We have outliers like Mayor Mamdani who want to build more housing, but he’s notably a DSA member. He does have policies for housing which are more effective than “fewer regulations and the market will solve it”.

    As such, if the argument is “Conservative controlled areas have fewer regulations, and thus more housing gets built”, that’s a very tenuous argument. The right wing ideology at play isn’t “We should build more housing” but rather the usual “No one tells me what to do” attitude endemic to right wing thinking.

    Furthermore, conservative areas tend to be sparser, which makes for more room to build, with fewer restrictions New York City is already dense. Adding more stuff is going to be more difficult and complicated than adding another building to Tumbleweeds, AR.

    Lastly, if you did somehow prove that “conservative solutions to the housing crisis are good, actually, and aren’t just deregulation and capitalist market solutions”, I guess I would have to update my statement to “Almost all right wing ideas are bad”. But as I’m not convinced this is the exception, I stand by my original claim.



  • “Public space in Paris is chaos,” right-winger Rachida Dati said recently

    No right winger is worth listening to. I know nothing about Dati, but I am confident they are full of bad ideas.

    Dati’s proposals for the city include making it cheaper to park and getting rid of the low-emission zone in the city centre.

    As foretold.

    Every right wing idea is bad, and people proposing them should at best be laughed out of the room.



  • Fare changes usually are slower to change than gas prices for customers at the gas station. Bus fare in NYC is $3, and they can’t just change that day by day. (Unless our new mayor makes the buses free to ride!)

    It might be more expensive as energy costs go up, but services aren’t supposed to be run at a profit. The value in a mass transit system is very high.

    But there is probably an impact. Now I’m curious about how they decide the fares