Now that I have time for hobbies again I wanna dive right in to building up a home lab. Right now I just have a Netgear router that reached end of life, and a NAS i’d like to make accessible remotely, and a DIY router seems like the correct next step for me. I’m very interested in ad-blocking network wide and someday I’d like to host my own little webpage, but for now I’m really just barely getting started.

I’m information gathering, I don’t know what I don’t know and my networking skills are pretty weak anyway. But even if your needs and desires have nothing to do with mine, I also just like to hear people talk about their set ups. Please? 🌞

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    A used Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny M720q mini PC, with the PCIe riser and an Intel chipset (Huawei) dual-10 Gbit NIC, running a pretty basic install of OpenWrt. Has no issue with 10 Gbit throughput, maxes out at about maybe 12 Gbit if you do a full duplex test, which I think may be a limitation of the limited PCIe lanes in the riser.

    I got 10 Gbit internet at home, looked at the prices of 10 Gbit routers and noted right out! Built this for maybe $100 in stuff off of auctions.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    HP Prodesk with some i5 8th gen running proxmox and with a 4x 1gb pcie nic on which a opnsense vm runs.

    My DNS was done through pihole. Transitioned now to technitium-dns.

    My personal blocklist(s):
    https://github.com/Appoxo/Ad-Spam-Blocklist
    Contains a list for opnsense (IPs) and technitium-dns (but pihole should be compatible).
    Anything else should be mentioned in the readme.

    In case of questions, feel free to ask.

  • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I run some china box with 5 integrated 2.5GBe NICs, 48GB RAM and 2x 500GB SSD/NVMe. CPU is Celeron® 6305 @ 1.80GHz, two cores or HT, who knows…

    On this I run Proxmox. I didn’t like Proxmox integrated firewall, so I rolled my own.

    all containers unprivileged

    one container is the firewall. it has all up+down stream NICs mapped via bridges, cable internet, backup 5g internet on dedicated ports. one port to the switch with a few VLANs, and one bridge that is local to the Proxmox for the local VLANs.

    Every service I operate sits in its own network/segment, usually with a /30 netmask. VMs/containers have a eth0 device in this and the firewall defined as default gw. On the firewall the VLAN interfaces are named as the container/service. So the interfaces are not eth0 but wan, wan5g, frigate etc. Great for readability.

    Some networks like “family” or “guest” or the one with the APs/WLAN-controller are /24. Bit big, but what ever.

    I have a structured netfilter firewall script, fw.sh calling it’s parts under fw.d/*fw. Each service is managed individually, sometimes widely open (iptables -A FORWARD -i frigate -o wan* -j ACCEPT) but usually down to the required ports. Database, reverse proxy etc all on separate containers.

    There is also like 30 VPN configs from 2 VPN providers. I have a home assistant dashboard where I can direct specific devices to use specifig VPNs. My webradio is routed via UK so I can enjoy BBC2.

    root@mercury:~# ip rule show
    0:      from all lookup local
    20:     from all lookup main suppress_prefixlength 1
    300:    from XXX lookup wan_table
    310:    from XXX lookup wan5g_table
    1000:   from all fwmark 0x1 lookup bbc-ss-lon
    1001:   from all fwmark 0x1 lookup bbc-ss-man
    3000:   from XXX lookup pm-gb
    4000:   from all lookup wan_table
    5000:   from all lookup wan_table
    5100:   from all lookup wan5g_table
    32766:  from all lookup main
    32767:  from all lookup default
    

    ip rule also does the fail over to wan5g if required. There are some rules where I tried to auto-filter BBC traffic with marked connections via dnsmasq, but BBC knows all my VPNs (not BBC radio it seems).

    IPSec VPNs and other OpenVPNs (dialup, site2site) are handled via a dedicated LXC. There is a tor entry node container, for a few services and one of the public WLANs. Firewall makes sure certain traffic can only exit via certain upstream interfaces, vpn*, wan, wan*… very helpful

    I didn’t like opensense… don’t know why. Work a lot with firewalls in my job (mainly check point, fortigate) so have some professional background.

    Also: client isolated WiFi for all iot shit. No internet for TV (jellyfin), PV controllers and most others.

  • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m running pfsense with wireguard site to site connection between 2 locations. Vlan for my mqtt for my meshtastic. I did have an ad blocker on it but I found it wasn’t very good. It was blocking too many things.

    Switched to Adguard on my Proxmox instead.

  • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I build a Linux system with multiple NICs. It’s heavyweight for a router, and probably not very efficient, but it does the job very well and I love it. I’m using foomuuri to manage the NFTables and NAT and it was very easy (although it’s a very obscure piece of software and the documentation and community isn’t excessively comprehensive, you might have better luck with something more common but it works nicely for me). It can pull in all the adblocking lists and all that fun stuff. I find it pretty intuitive to configure, at least compared to the horrors of most networking/routing configuration nonsense.

    For DHCP I tried using the ISC’s new “kea” in the hopes it would be modern and clean alternative to the venerable old isc-dhcp-server but it turned out to be a horrible mistake. They made some awful, insane, unjustifiable design decisions in that software. It gets confused about IP addresses already being claimed (by the exact same host/MAC) address because some arbitrary value changed in how it identifies itself, and then does absurd things with static leases, it just randomly decides to give it a dynamic lease instead, and then will fixate on that dynamic lease and never let it have the static lease back, I fought with it for months, it kept breaking my network for absolutely no reason and it was a nightmare.

    Back to trusty old isc-dhcp-server for me. And of course bind for DNS, I’m a bit old-school but it’s very comfortable.

    dnsmasq might be a lighter-weight and easier alternative you could consider, I think it does DHCP as well, convenient.

    And of course, being a full Linux server means you can put all kinds of other stuff on it too. Stuff that needs to be both publicly visible and privately visible on the LAN seems like an obvious fit, but in fact it’s probably the worst place to put those services, because you run into issues with NAT hairpinning and other nonsense. For services that are strictly intended for the private LAN/VPN, or services that are strictly public facing, it can handle those just fine by restricting them to a specific interface. But you should avoid stuff that needs to listen on both sides of the connection, it can be done, but it’s tricky and annoying and not ideal.

    If you need both internal and external access, port-forwarding from the outside through the NAT to another dedicated internal host is a much better solution if possible, it’s still a bit tricky (you may have to override the DNS for that domain internally to use the private IP instead of the public one) but it’s quite reliable and functional once you have it set up.

    None of this is really for the faint of heart, it’ll likely require a fair bit of trial and error and physical access to the machine to resolve issues. But it’s a fun project and I think the end result is worth it.

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nice. I recently migrated from bind/isc-dhcp to dnsmasq, which has a cleaner 1-line per reservation syntax. PowerDNS is what I manage my domains with, but not in my home-homelab.

  • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I used to run opnsense on a Xeon blade in my old C6100. It worked well enough but was a waste. Now it’s just a stock ER605 without the Omada controller.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was using an N100 based mini PC and it did fine at 1gbit. But now that I have 3, and it’s realistically closer to 4 or 5 it doesn’t cut the mustard.

    Proper hardware based routers are also just so much more efficient. That N100 machine was constantly hot to the touch. My new UniFi router uses less power and does 10 gig easily.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have 2.5G N100 and it works wonderfully at that rate. I think higher might be tough, but it still pushes that throughput even with IPS enabled in OPNsense.

      The complained about heat is right though. I stuck a noctua fan on the top and it’s been happy since. It lives my closet, so noise isn’t a facto anyways

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I usually just use proper network devices. OpenWRT will generally run on anything with Mediatec or Qualcomm based assuming it has support

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I bought a firewall appliance based on an Intel CPU, with 4x 2.5gbps Ethernet ports, 8gb ram. Installed opnSense on it and been super happy even since!

    A bit pricey the hardware, but it’s been totally rock solid for almost two years now.

    I have configured unbound with ad blocking on opnSense, and it has every single option I would ever want on it. Amazing stuff.

    • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.appOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve seen a lot of people on YouTube talking about this or that cast off networking device that they turned into a router. I do find the idea of repurposing especially old tech appealing. Or did you buy it brand new?

  • nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s currently a N100 mini-pc running Debian, but in the past it’s been all kinds of random hardware including a busted old laptop with an expresscard-PCIe riser for the second NIC. Anything can be a router if you know what you’re doing!

    https://nbailey.ca/post/router/

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    When I retire my desktop PC, the old parts become my router. If you have two network ports, it can do it.

    To warrant the power bill, it’s also a NAS, NVR, mail server, print server and web server.

    All my Wifi APs are various home routers flashed with OpenWRT.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Oh, you can tear it down as soon as you get the certification.

        Mine still runs decades later though.

      • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’ve been running mine for over 20 years. It’s certainly got more difficult, especially to be able to reliably communicate with Gmail-hosted servers and outlook.com addresses, but SPF, DMARC, and DKIM are all pretty straightforward to set up. Tightening the encryption/hash algorithms you accept and “anonymizing” your server greetings takes some finesse as well, but I definitely prefer it this way.

        I avoid the entire webmail and spam filtering aspects, smtp(s) and imap(s) only.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Router is a bunch of old PCs I frankensteined and put opnsense on.

    Ended up i5-7500, 8gb mem, 500gb SSD.

    Put in a dual-port SFP+ NIC and a dual port 2.5GbaseT nic.

    One of the 2.5gb ports goes to my cable modem.

    One of the 10gb ports takes Twinax to my dumb LAN switch, the other to my dumb server switch, which right now is really just my storage network…the link to the firewall isn’t doing anytuhing.

    The dumb switches I have here, though, they’ve got some sort of weird MAC learning disability. It cannot handle macflaps, which I found out about because I had a hard time roaming between APs.

    So I got a Netgear GS108T and put OpenWRT on it, and that switches between my APs.

    My APs are Linksys MX4200v1’s. Also openwrt. Got four of them…one upstairs, two in the ground floor, one in the basement. Can get very close to 1Gbps anywhere in the house on wifi. Not the best platform for openwrt (ipq807x), as I’ve found out…but it was a hella cheap deal for tri-band AX APs.

    • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.appOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think this is what I’m gonna end up doing, but I LOVE STORIES LIKE THIS. Frankensteining a bunch of shit together just makes me feel so nostalgic for how I got into PCs in the first place. MAC learning disability also made me laugh.