The Pentagon is seething over a Washington Post report that top military leaders recently warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth against extending large-scale Iran war operations.

People familiar with a classified assessment prepared for Hegseth told the Post that several combatant commanders have advised the Defense chief that prolonging operations against Iran is unsustainable and risks weakening the U.S.’s ability to address threats elsewhere, including on U.S. soil.

The warnings appear in the Aug. 14 edition of the Secretary of Defense Orders Book (SDOB), detailed by the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force, and the four-star commanders overseeing U.S. operations throughout Europe, Asia and Latin America, the Post reported Sunday.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Look, if you’re running such a shit-show that the fuckin’ Bezos Post publishes your leak, maybe you look in the mirror once you wake up from your post-workout everclear shots (gotta minimize them empty calories!).

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The actual reason why they’re upset is because it is now public knowledge that doing this is stupid and their subordinates told them so, so they can’t deflect blame later. W and Rumsfeld were smart and evil enough to preempt or quickly get rid of those people before Iraq. It’s almost funny how they can’t even do another Middle East war of choice properly

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan were done “properly.” Half the generals quit because the iraq invasion violated all precepts and doctrines of invasions. What is the ratio, 50 troops for every 1,000 civilians in a hostile population? The US went in with way less.

        Don’t take my word for it, you can read EVERY single Inspector General Report on those wars where the inspector castigates our leadership in progressively certain terms.

        I do get your point, these clowns are even less capable. But let’s not pretend the bush clows were. They were the worst administration to that date in time.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Frankly, it had to be very bad to get these guys to go as far as “non-concur” in writing at all.

        Hegseth is literally unqualified to manage a large bureaucracy of any kind, evil or not, much less one with bombs and guns. I am guessing that it’s a day-to-day operational shit-show, on top of being the same type of moral and long-term-strategy shit-show that Iraq was.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Hegseth is literally unqualified to manage a large bureaucracy of any kind, evil or not

          As is his boss and most of that boss’ direct reports.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Are you claiming fox news anchors shouldn’t be running the executive branch of the United States? It feels like that should be a joke about what if things really went to hell but here we are.

        • Malica@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I imagine it’s going as well as it did with the hidden destroyed bases