• SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Here’s something I’ve wondered about for a while now: Why do some voters have to be assiduously courted, and it’s a failure of the candidate if she doesn’t win them over, while for other voters the blame falls on the voters if they don’t fall in line and vote for the candidate?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Why do some voters have to be assiduously courted, and it’s a failure of the candidate if she doesn’t win them over

      Because that’s literally the job of a politician running for office.

      for other voters the blame falls on the voters if they don’t fall in line and vote for the candidate?

      Because of tribalist authoritarianism and gaslighting.

      It’s much easier to get away with ignoring the wants and needs of your constituency when you convince them that it’s about teams, not policies.

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s much easier to get away with ignoring the wants and needs of your constituency when you convince them that it’s about teams, not policies.

        This right here.

        Mine was a loaded question. After decades of this stuff, it’s entirely clear to me that the difference is that Democrats do not have policy to offer many voters, so all that they have to fall back on is team boosterism. If Harris did have something substantive to offer these Michigan voters, she and her supporters would’ve offered it.

        But they didn’t, so all that they had left is what we see: Blame and derision.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The truth is… it’s a popularity contest at the heart of it. Always has been. If you aren’t popular enough in the zeitgeist of enough people, then you ain’t winning shit.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The nice thing about blame is it’s an infinite resource. We can always make more of it. That’s why I blame the politicians and the voters.