The lack of a U.S. carrier in the Pacific may be short-lived if the Navy deploys another in the next couple of months. But it shows how the open-ended operations with Iran are running some American sailors ragged, analysts say, while the Trump administration further retreats from the Asia-Pacific region and focuses on the Western Hemisphere.

“The administration says that the Pacific is supposed to be the most important behind the Western Hemisphere,” said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Instead, the U.S. is “doing the exact opposite” of its previously expressed goal of pulling out of the Middle East.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    we can’t discount the possibility of Xi being as stupid as Trump and Putin.

    I’m trying to think of a comparable series of blunders the Chinese have committed.

    Xi’s much more in the mold of an Obama or a Merkle than Putin or Trump

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The three-week incursion into Vietnam in 1979 was certainly a bad decision by the Chinese government. Idk if it stacks up against the American 13 year invasion, occupation, terror-bombing, and torture/assassination campaign that became emblematic of US Foreign policy. Easy to forget the scope of the difference between the two interventions, given how often modern China-watchers love to bring up the former while neglecting the latter.

        But do you have anything perpetrated by the Xi administration specifically? Or just something a sitting administrative official actually presided over?

        • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          I mean sure, but I don’t see China behaving much better if they ever become a super-power the way the US was for the last hundred years. Especially considering their treatment of Uyghurs.

          I would argue a large part of China not trying to militarily expand their Power was US dominance and their global policing.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 minutes ago

            I don’t see China behaving much better if they ever become a super-power

            I’m not sure what else they’d need to do to qualify, shy of actually building out a global network of military bases. In that case, sure. If they start acting like the US, then they’re no better than the US.

            But for the time being, what I’m seeing - and I’ll quote Dr Lubinda Haabazoka, Director of the University of Zambia Graduate School of Business and former President of the Economics Association of Zambia on this one

            Every time China visits we get a hospital, every time Britain visits we get a lecture.

            To date, I’ve seen a lot of Chinese Hospitals (and factories and ports and colleges) opening up across the world. Meanwhile, the only thing guys like Trump and Starmer seem to want to contribute are frowns, finger wags, and 500 lb bunker busters onto wedding parties.