• SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s possible all these “totally unexpected breaches” are just AI companies testing the waters to see what they can get away with.

    “Oopsie poopsies, we didn’t know our AI would scrape tax records when we told it to do that! Totally unexpected emergent behavior, we are not responsible…”

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      AISI is the AI Security Institute, so it’s within their remit to discover what the AI companies’ products can do - but then to not be monitoring them while they were running is where I call incompetence and negligence.

      This is at least independent verification that these “breaches” aren’t just AI bro marketing.

        • Deebster@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Here we were having a civil, good faith discussion, then you start flinging around downvotes to try to suppress any post you don’t 100% approve of. That’s not conducive to quality discourse, and you should stop it. You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.

          Thanks for the link and I’ll look into this, but I won’t be talking with you any further.

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I thought it was a bad comment, so I downvoted it. I may be open to removing the downvote.

            You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.

            I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. My comments get downvotes 42% of the time? Or I downvote comments 42% of the time?

            I often have discussions with death cultists and open bigots, I may be in the habit of downvoting and/or being downvoted.