AISI is the AI Security Institute, so it’s within their remit to discover what the AI companies’ products can do - but then to not be monitoring them while they were running is where I call incompetence and negligence.
This is at least independent verification that these “breaches” aren’t just AI bro marketing.
Here we were having a civil, good faith discussion, then you start flinging around downvotes to try to suppress any post you don’t 100% approve of. That’s not conducive to quality discourse, and you should stop it. You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.
Thanks for the link and I’ll look into this, but I won’t be talking with you any further.
AISI is the AI Security Institute, so it’s within their remit to discover what the AI companies’ products can do - but then to not be monitoring them while they were running is where I call incompetence and negligence.
This is at least independent verification that these “breaches” aren’t just AI bro marketing.
Wrong, they’re in bed with Anthropic.
https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/uk-ai-safety-institute-rebrands/
Here we were having a civil, good faith discussion, then you start flinging around downvotes to try to suppress any post you don’t 100% approve of. That’s not conducive to quality discourse, and you should stop it. You comments votes are downvotes 42% of the time.
Thanks for the link and I’ll look into this, but I won’t be talking with you any further.
I thought it was a bad comment, so I downvoted it. I may be open to removing the downvote.
I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. My comments get downvotes 42% of the time? Or I downvote comments 42% of the time?
I often have discussions with death cultists and open bigots, I may be in the habit of downvoting and/or being downvoted.