• Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    You couldn’t have chosen a worse example even if you tried.

    Edit: The downvotes just show how disconnected the userbase here is. I’ll bet none of you have touched cs in a decade.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        VAC doesnt immediately ban when a cheat is detected, It delays the ban to make it harder for cheat makers to figure out what, when, how, and why it was detected.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          And? It still detects the cheats and bans the users. And it does it without kernel-level anti-cheat.

          The delay isn’t a limitation, it’s a design decision to prevent reverse engineering, as you’ve point out. Yet that didn’t stop you from falsely alluding that it’s not capable

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Why the fuck you going at me with both guns drawn when all I did was explain, factually and neutrally, about how VAC works and why you see bans happen in waves instead of in the moment?