• ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s happed a couple times. In neither case did I downvote all posts (or even most posts) because not all posts to the community were downvote-worthy.

    • DundasStation@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Then that’s 100% the fault of those mods that banned you. I get wanting to ban people that mass downvote for no reason, but banning for a single downvote is just power tripping behaviour.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        One of them was a mod gone rogue which I hadn’t realized at the time. The ban eventually got overturned and the mod was booted.

        One of them was a new probable troll com with a sole troll mod. It was a new community so I was still willing to give it a chance. So that one…yeah, you’re probably right, I probably should have just blocked the com, but I was still giving it a chance.

        I’m loose with downvotes but avoid blocking coms if I can.

        • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Here and there I see people complaining about the things you detail in the comments, and sometimes out of curiosity I check that person’s attitude, and every single time it’s been pretty miserable.

          Lo and behold, your current attitude sits at 46%, meaning (as I understand it) that you’re downvoting more often than you’re upvoting. My question is: what are you even doing here if you’re so obviously unsatisfied by so much content on the Fediverse? And is it maybe time that you found a social media site that better fits your likes…?

          • ccunning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lo and behold, your current attitude sits at 46%, meaning (as I understand it) that you’re downvoting more often than you’re upvoting

            That seems like an oddly precise number.

            I definitely upvote more than I downvote. It shouldn’t be surprising that in a conversation about getting banned for downvoting that the discussion would focus more on the downvotes.

            • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Over there on Lemmy.World, what happens when you hover your mouse over another user’s name? Does a popup card of info appear after a second or two?

              In any case, that’s what appears using PieFed software, which is where the 46% number is listed. And yeah-- for sure it’s a precise number, exactly calculated from your upvote / downvote ratio.

              I can also see such info (and more) if I go ahead and click on another user’s ID, but the popup box is certainly handy for not needing to do that.

              • ccunning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Interesting - I pretty much exclusively browse Lemmy on mobile with a third party app. That number is surprising though…🤔