• Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Most of the casualties were from bombers for a long time already, this is that but one step removed.
    It’s bad for a different reason, you in this case don’t exist anymore. We used to have people killing people, now there are autonomous robots doing this, and that’s a new, completely different class of warfare.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The scariest thing is, autonomous “soldiers” can do what bombers cannot: Go building-to-building and door-to-door.

      The cost and risk of urban engagements and “boots on the ground” was usually the final commitment of warfare.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Even before bombers existed for every person killed on a battlefield a ton of people who didn’t see a single enemy soldier died because that army had destroyed or used up the region’s food supplies or introduced a new disease or diverted a river’s water.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, and also, many political leaders just say, “kill your enemies,” and the deed gets done nowadays. I’m pretty sure that’s been the case for a long time too.