LandoLuma@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThe Complete Guide to Self-Hosting: From Hardware to Nextcloudthecybersecguru.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down162
arrow-up1-28arrow-down1external-linkThe Complete Guide to Self-Hosting: From Hardware to Nextcloudthecybersecguru.comLandoLuma@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·19 hours agoI thought you were being facetious, so I clicked the link anyway. No, it’s chat for sure. I hate the world today.
minus-squareSuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoCan’t be ChatGPT. Not enough goblins. It’s obsessed with goblins of late.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoIt’s not displayed in the output. The verbiage is nearly identical to all chat generated text
minus-squareSuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 hours agoIronically, with a bit of effort, it’s quite possible to get an LLM to mimic on your own house style and replicate it quite well. You can use it as an editor or hostile reviewer or just bounce ideas off it, as long as you own the process. Language transformation is literally what they exist for. But the fact that the article failed to do this and produced generic slop is the actual insult. Not the fact that they used AI. Like, we get it - portfolio slop / LinkedIn brain / look at me, look at me. I don’t mind you using AI, but could you at least steer it a bit and do more than minimal effort? Or should I get my ai to talk to your ai?
I thought you were being facetious, so I clicked the link anyway. No, it’s chat for sure. I hate the world today.
Can’t be ChatGPT. Not enough goblins. It’s obsessed with goblins of late.
It’s not displayed in the output. The verbiage is nearly identical to all chat generated text
Ironically, with a bit of effort, it’s quite possible to get an LLM to mimic on your own house style and replicate it quite well.
You can use it as an editor or hostile reviewer or just bounce ideas off it, as long as you own the process.
Language transformation is literally what they exist for.
But the fact that the article failed to do this and produced generic slop is the actual insult. Not the fact that they used AI.
Like, we get it - portfolio slop / LinkedIn brain / look at me, look at me.
I don’t mind you using AI, but could you at least steer it a bit and do more than minimal effort? Or should I get my ai to talk to your ai?