• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait 1/3 of the raster performance seems like a massive downgrade, right? Or am I reading that wrong

    • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am assuming they are saying raster performance will be 30% to 35% higher than the 5000 series.

      There is no way raster would be 35% of the performance of the 5000 series.