(I’m just trying to learn. No hidden mockery in this and this is no gotcha bs aimed at t women. I’m NOT transphobic. Just saw this in a debate and wanted to know other people’s thoughts)

I just want to know:

  1. Is this factually correct?
  2. If it is, does it matter? Why or why not?
  3. How would you logically respond to this?
  4. How does this statement not contradict with Trans Women are Women
  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago
    1. “Biologically fe/male” is a pseudoscientific term created to delegitimize trans individuals, so

    2. It does not matter

    3. see above

    4. It’s intended to be a contradiction, an insidious doubt or caveat that delegitimizes the declaration that trans individuals are who they say they are.

    Don’t fall for it. Don’t perpetuate it. Delete this post, is my advice.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      I would second all of this, except for the suggestion to delete it. It’s a common question.

      To reiterate, “biologically male” means very little scientifically. Sex in biology is far more complicated than most people understand.

      It doesn’t matter, because when we discuss gender socially, we’re not describing reproductive capabilities. We don’t stop calling women women when they go through menopause, for instance.

      If someone wants to debate it, say no thanks. It’s a waste of your time. If someone asks in good faith, you can explain it if you feel capable, or shrug and say you’re not really sure, but it doesn’t matter.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Biologically female

      That’s just redundant. “female” generally already refers to biology. Only silly people use “female” to refer to gender identity.