• ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    They can still sell the airplane if Ryanair doesn’t pay. Did you want them to screw the innocent passengers for that flight too?

    • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Well, the plane is in another country. They can’t really sell something they are not in possession of.

      I guess they could seize another plane.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Lugano Covention means that EU court orders are almost always immediately valid across all EU and EEA member states, and while that leaves out countries like the UK and Serbia, their courts will usually confirm court orders from other European countries (and it would be a big diplomatic incident if they didn’t in this case). Equally important, Ireland is a signatory of the Lugano Convention through the EU, so Ryanair would have more to lose than planes really fast if they decided to be irrational.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      If Ryanair is evil/incompetent enough to screw a whole plane load of passengers over a couple hundred euro, how is that the fault of the original victim?

      You want to deny them justice because RyanAir is using other passengers as a shield?

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The court can sell the Boeing 737 at public auction if the debt is not paid by a deadline.

        Unless Ryanair steals the airplane, the debt will be paid. And if they steal the airplane, then they will have a problem much bigger than €890.

        This was a reasonable and proportional solution to the problem.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ryanair operates in numerous countries. What’s stopping them from just moving the plane to “coincidentally” operate only in countries that won’t bother with seizing the plane?

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            7 days ago

            So Ryanair would just need to quit the entirety of the European market, move their entire fleet in record time without anyone noticing, and hope Jordanian and Moroccan courts don’t decide to recognize the Austrian court order? For €890.

            It’s a funny thought exercise, but in practice they are going to pay the compensation.

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Am I the only one who has never experienced an issue with RyanAir? Maybe the issues are more pronounced in other countries with laxer regulations and consumer protection laws, but I know what I’m in for when I book RA. I am not the typical traveler, I travel to strange places and alone and very light and (no I don’t smuggle drugs except accidentally a few times) have a high pain tolerance, but never had a late flight or got shit that wasn’t printed on the box.

              • Damage@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Am I the only one who has never experienced an issue with RyanAir?

                No I’m sure there’s plenty of people who have never been on one of their flights

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            A lot of factors, including that it would mess up positioning for all their fleet and would cost them far more than the fine would.