bdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.comexternal-linkmessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1515arrow-down1external-linkLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.combdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square161fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·4 hours agoAs the maintainer said, the commits with AI code were already specified. See one here. It was never a secret.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 minutes agoIt was my impression that the AI stuff only started with a relatively recent update
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 minutes agoMaybe, I don’t know much about this tool or their practices. I only meant that it was factual that they were mentioning which commits had AI generated code in them.
minus-squareNonononoki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 hours agoHe now removed the code authorship from Claude lmao
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoHence the past tense. I think it was pretty petty to do this.
As the maintainer said, the commits with AI code were already specified. See one here. It was never a secret.
It was my impression that the AI stuff only started with a relatively recent update
Maybe, I don’t know much about this tool or their practices. I only meant that it was factual that they were mentioning which commits had AI generated code in them.
He now removed the code authorship from Claude lmao
Hence the past tense. I think it was pretty petty to do this.