French President Emmanuel Macron announced Monday that France will increase its nuclear arsenal and, for the first time, allow the temporary deployment of its nuclear-armed aircraft to allied countries, in a new strategy aimed at strengthening Europe’s independence.

  • DeepSeaString@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Isn’t this a good thing though it allows Europe to be more independent and not get dragged into US wars.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes, it’s exactly that. It’s France showing the world that EU countries are just fine without the US, so no one—yku know who—should get any ideas.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Many on the left are under the misapprehension that being a pacifist must mean being defenceless.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Go bring that sarcasm to Ukrainians - I’m sure they’ll love it.

        • j4yc33@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It is a regrettable truth that the defensive posture of humanity, until everyone agrees to denuclearization, against nuclear warfare is the deterrance of Mutually Assured Destruction.

    • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not trying to make a political statement out of it. Just noticing the anxiety everything that happens in the world has produced over the last decades

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The fact that the EU needs to defend itself adequately is not mutually exclusive with how all this nuclear proliferation lowers the birth rate.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If somebody’s not having kids because “nukes” then I suppose I’m happy they’re not reproducing.

          • DeepSeaString@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah I think this is much more of the case because nukes can be more of a distant thought since it hasn’t happened yet and people haven’t directly experienced it. Money and the high cost to do anything now I would say is a much bigger driver as people are experiencing that everyday and can’t afford to have a kid

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        France has like 300 warheads vs russian 4.5K, plus russians started proliferating first. I say let them do it, sow the wind and all that. Birthrate is gonna be shit anyway while we have billionaires

        edit: if i were polish this nuclear proliferation would calm me down actually