UPDATE :

The US has carried out a submarine torpedo strike that sank an Iranian warship off the south coast of Sri Lanka, according to the US secretary of defence.

Pete Hegseth confirmed that the US was behind the deadly strike on an Iranian frigate that was travelling close to the Sri Lankan coast.

“An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters,” Hegseth said. “Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo.”

US submarine sank Iranian warship off Sri Lanka’s coast, Hegseth says

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Its simply that the US hasn’t needed to. There have been three ships sunk by torpedoes from a sub since 1945.

    Improvements in communication security and aerial capabilities mean its more advantageous to preserve the invisibility of the submarine and use it to identify and track targets, and for aerial and surface combatants to engage.

    If you actually mean they haven’t been used — they have. They’re very powerful tools for intelligence gathering.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That was my point.

      You can bet your ass that Iran (& any others operating in the region) will be sharing those sensor logs with China to lessen the invisibility of US submarines.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        What sensor logs? The first time that ship was aware something was up was when the stern blew off.

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Pretty sure there are other things in the Indian Ocean with sensors, and even the ship that was hit likely has sensor readings that in retrospect can make spotting US subs easier.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Acoustic buoys? Your expectations may be a bit high. It took days to find the Titan submersible when they had acoustic readings, they knew where it was aiming to go, it wasn’t moving, and it wasn’t actively hiding. The ocean is rather vast.

            • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              China & Russia have subs too and when Titan went smush nobody was going to give away that they heard it, but it’s likely that if any military had cared it would have been found much sooner.

        • Dultas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yeah, you can tell from the video that crew were mustering on deck. They had 0 knowledge they were under attack.