• Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    … Which is why historically it is used as currency… kinda burying the lede there.

    Bottle caps (fallout franchise), cigarettes, ramen packets (prison), sea shells (aka wampun in some Native American Cultures), salt (early scarcity) and gold are “valuable” because they are used as currency, where they are given value in excess of their actual ability to be used.

    These attributes are not specific to gold alone, many other metals, jewels also share the same attributes of being able to used as currency due to their ease of division, relative scarcity and not rot aka “ability to store value” as the egg heads say.

    Suffice to say, gold isn’t valuable because it is gold (I can eat a ramen packets, smoke a cigarette) it isn’t valuable because it is backed by. the government (we explicitly use it because it isn’t fiat) but rather it is valuable because IT WAS MONEY, because carrying 500 cheese wheels isn’t a thing irl.

    I can point you to further reading, but just about all MacroEcon text books will cover this in the first chapter.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was understand ALL of that, but the point is that Gold carries a significant value over and above its monetary value, and that’s part of the reason that it has remained among the most desirable, and most popular, precious metals throughout history.