Dav09@mander.xyz to Reddit@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoBatmenmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down16
arrow-up1341arrow-down1external-linkBatmenmander.xyzDav09@mander.xyz to Reddit@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareLuckingFurker (Any/All)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoI had the same argument with a guy at work about Spiderman. I will die on the hill that the plural is “Spidermans”
minus-squarephilophilsaurus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·edit-23 days agoActually, both are wrong.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoSpider’s-Men?
minus-squareP00ptart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoCareful, you’re awfully close to invoking a sentient swarm of spiders.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoSpiderman can definitely be pluralised that way if it’s a surname. I’m conflicted otherwise. Spider-matopodes?
I had the same argument with a guy at work about Spiderman. I will die on the hill that the plural is “Spidermans”
Actually, both are wrong.
Spider’s-Men?
Careful, you’re awfully close to invoking a sentient swarm of spiders.
Spiderman can definitely be pluralised that way if it’s a surname. I’m conflicted otherwise.
Spider-matopodes?