In your opinion which one made you noticed people mindset getting dumber, superficial, vain, zombie-like or worst?

  • Reddit
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • Snapchat
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Twitter/Bluesky/Threads/Mastodon

    Twitter and it’s imitations have taught us quote-dunking, by extension the idea that online debates are productive, and the idea that nuance is a waste of words. Outside of that it’s just algorithmic curation in general that’s damaging so all the other sites are equal.

    • BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Have to agree. And this is pervasive enough that lazy articles about tweets are now a major percentage of online “news”. So-and-so destroys x-and-such on Twitter!" So what? It doesn’t change anything or anyone’s mind.

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Anything that encourages the sharing of small snippets of information, elevates the prominence of misinformation thanks to engagement algorithms and reduces discourse to simple 3 word responses have caused the most damage.

    So facebook/instagram/tiktok/twitter.

    Reddit wouldn’t count in my view. It encourages lengthier, more critical responses. Yes its an echo chamber in places but its also pretty easy to avoid toxic content.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Facebook killed family members. No really, COVID got them and they didnt recover. They got all their news from Facebook. Not from anything close to official. Facebook was all they were on 24x7. That and Fox news. It was sad but what can you do? Its the new Darwin award and Facebook facilitated it.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I wouldn’t mind the flood of spam, right-wing nonsense, and guesstimated content in the browsing streams quite so much if I at least there was a useful bias for seeing what people on my friends’ & subscribed lists were posting, but NOOoooo… (cue John Belushi)

      At this point they’ve hilariously turned their own product in to something that doesn’t hold even the slightest bit of value for me, anymore. I really need to send Zuck a nice gift-basket of elephant dung for doing me that helpful favor. 😊

  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s hard to compare between platforms because of how they cater to different audiences, but if we’re going off sheer numerical scale towards social unrest, Facebook is the clear frontrunner.

    The main reason is Facebook Zero, the program established to provide access to the platform in developing and under resourced nations at no costs to the users (with some exceptions), leading to billions of users around the world to view Facebook as “The internet” ™.

    Wikipedia link to Facebook Zero: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Zero

    Criticism of Facebook Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Facebook

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    All of them.

    If there was a way to enable “see verified accounts only”, and “verified” actually meant using a system of legal identity verification in each territory, I would.

    By how accounts talk on social networks, I struggle to see more than 5% actually coming from real people. The alternative, that people really are this uneducated, fooled, mean and angry, is just too horrible to bear. I have to believe it’s discord bots destroying our democracy, not actual people. It is, right? Right?!

  • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Reddit. Otherwise we wouldn’t enjoy using a website with its exact mechanics. We are warped. You see the upvotes and downvotes spreading to all kinds of sites. Lesswrong (nucleus of Hitlerian AI cult insanity) wasn’t satisfied and has two forms of upvotes and downvotes. Every site that implements them agrees the voting is meaningless or not to be taken seriously, but they make it their main aggregation tool.

  • Spinoza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Twitter ruined people’s image of reality. The echo chamber, the content generated for follower counts, the view that the perspectives on Twitter somehow represented what the mainstream population was concerned with, the entitlement that stemmed from each individual thinking they had and deserved a megaphone, the dumbing down of thoughts to meet character limits; that platform was severely detrimental to American society. In my opinion, these issues are far worse than the brain rot, vapid influencer schtick, and right wing radicalization the others generated.

    • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The fact that Xwitter became such an echo chamber and that people there really started to believe that they were the moral compasses of humanity made it gain the appropriate nickname, here in Brazil, of “Black (in the sense of rotten) Banana Institute”.

    • Lunatique Princess@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Brain rots REALLY bad but yes twitters character limit alone was a instant decline in dialogue and commentary. I’ve honestly never used it to see an internal representation of how it’s doing damage mentally. So thanks for the insight with this comment