• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    “we have no choice but to follow Reddits guidelines”

    There’s another choice, but that would require you to look past reddit.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oof… Yeah I mean… yeah. That’s a pretty apt description of how the world is where it is now.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      They even have to leave, they just have to ignore the admins and become ungovernable.

      But they won’t, because they’re cowards.

    • Ohi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You plant shit seeds, you get shit weeds. I hate the fact that Reddit has grown since I bailed over for API changes. It hurts my soul knowing I did the right thing and bailed but the vast majority of people who were pissed off at Reddit ended up back on the platform.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not true - we’re just not allowed to discuss jury nullification in the context of encouraging someone to commit a violent felony which includes the promise of absolution through jury nullification.

          Or something, idk. It was kinda weird.

          Jury nullification as two English words that can be spoken one after the other, however, is perfectly allowable.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            !lemmyworld

            We have previously asked moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification when this was suggested in context of murder or other violent crimes. Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            You can for past crimes, not future crimes.

            The whole statement: https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyworld

            About the manifesto

            If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

            https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

            On the other hand, there is !AskUSA@discuss.online that got created recently. This thread can interest you, it talks about jury nullification: https://lemmy.world/post/22973877

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not that the mods are aware, but if Reddit disappeared tomorrow, I (sadly) suspect most users would go to Twitter or various Discords.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’ve thought about it as some of my niche interests have dried up on Reddit and apparently only live on Twitter now.

          And maybe Discord. It’s hard to tell because it’s closed, but I see hints of discussion spilling out into GH issues or whatever.

          I despise both for different reasons, but where else am OlI gonna go if I actually want to talk with the community?