

I don’t know if that’s true if they don’t publish a list of that. I certainly wouldn’t know how.


I don’t know if that’s true if they don’t publish a list of that. I certainly wouldn’t know how.


Yes. I have seen comments before from obscure instances that didn’t seem to be open to the public. It wouldn’t really make much technical sense to prevent that.


this, and also: what exactly is the question?!


If the Lemmy instance isn’t public anyway, then it seems like its federation list doesn’t have to be public either, so other instance admins would have no way of knowing what such an instance federates with.


Me too. It even supports connecting to SFTP servers (maybe needs an extension).


A header that says “user is under 18, no nsfw content” should generally be fine and should be sufficient, or websites could report a tag list like “tag: 18+ reason: explicit nudity” for the client to filter.
Voluntarily, not mandated by the government; and then without actual verification requirements.


No. Stop being constructive about this. There should not be age verification on the Internet, at all, period, no compromises whatsoever. People who want it to exist do not deserve that anyone work constructively with them, they deserve only complete and fundamental opposition.
KDE Plasma can be (and by default is) configured to work mostly like Windows, which I have to use at work anyway. I have no interest in having to do things radically differently on different computers I regularly use.


No, they are both not really suitable for that. But I don’t see where the link in the OP implies they plan to store binary image data in XML, they’re probably going to store that in a binary format and use XML to describe relationships and other metadata.


IMHO: XML is superior as a document storage format. JSON is superior as a data transfer format.


I would not do that without first looking into applicable laws regarding legal liability for content and requirements to remove things. Depending on where in the world you are, this can be a minefield.


I don’t often use BitTorrent at all, but Transmission is certainly the first client that comes to my mind, probably mainly because it came preinstalled with the distros I used when I was new to Linux (Debian and Ubuntu in the late 2000s). Not sure what advantages there are either way.


I continue to believe that in the US, the First Amendment prohibits any level of government from requiring operating systems in general to implement any features whatsoever. Distribution of software, including operating systems, in source or compiled form, is covered under “the freedom of speech”.
If the government thinks this is just product regulation, then fine, but then the law should be limited to operating systems preinstalled on devices.


Finding restaurants can be done with the same OpenStreetMap-based apps as navigation. I use OsmAnd all the time to find out where restaurants are.
But OpenStreetMap doesn’t have a review functionality, nor is it trivial to add one from an external site to one. Apparently there have been efforts in this direction, but I don’t know a lot about them: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Reviews
So I don’t have an answer for reviews. But the review databases that currently exist are a manipulation battleground which people should take with a grain of salt anyway.


That is not new. They’ve been doing that since the 2000s.
The way I understand it is that there are at least two reasons, maybe more:
Not everything Google or other big tech companies do is necessarily bad; we should be taking advantage of the good parts of what they do.


They do pretty much the same thing. If there are nuances, I do not know about them.

Thanks, that worked.

OK, thanks; how do I enable this myself in the communities where I’m a moderator? I don’t see that option.
The entire history of KDE has clearly been carefully planned to lead to the point where the version number is the same as the latest entry on the funny numbers list.
and let us hope it stays that way