Extrapolate from the context. I’m tired of explaining obvious things to unreceptive people.
I take my shitposts very seriously.
Extrapolate from the context. I’m tired of explaining obvious things to unreceptive people.
The discourse goes to the same fucking place every time Felix is mentioned. People don’t deserve the benefit of doubt.
I seriously doubt that anyone who asks that question doesn’t already have a foregone conclusion, but fine, I’ll indulge you.
Probably not. If he was, and had been hiding it his entire life, even in the era when he was the youtube star and had zero restraint, why would he slip up those few times, and especially such highly public ways?
He did and said some shit in his early 20s, and he deserved the criticism at the time, but those incidents weren’t repeated and weren’t part of a pattern. He wasn’t the paragon of virtue and maturity, but I’m willing to bet my left nut that neither are the people who are lining up to crucify him, and the only difference is that he had an audience. The people who aren’t willing to let go of their prejudices after a decade are equally as immature.
Do you want to continue posturing and fishing for confirmation from other edgy teenage minds, or do you want the answer?
I’m sure all the reactions will be nothing but respectful and factual, and not riddled with festering teenage emotions.
hosting their videos on their own website
I love that entrepreneurial attitude. If an online service is unsatisfactory, just develop your own software from the ground up and provision the infrastructure from your pocket. Car industry sucks? Just build your own car! GPU prices high? Grab a soldering iron and a handful of sand, how hard could it be?
Things are always more complex than they appear. The whole point of services like Youtube and Patreon is to offload that complexity onto the provider in exchange for a fee (or some other form of compensation) from the user. Just look at how many early Lemmy instances have gone offline because of the overwhelming financial or administrative burden. Hate the companies all you like, and by all means look for independent solutions, but don’t pretend they offer no value whatsoever.
What is missed is not necessary or available.
For some people, the differences can be deal breakers. Nix is interesting, but I won’t likely move away from Arch because access to the AUR is more valuable to me.
Mint also doesn’t install snap when you want to install an apt package, nor put Amazon ads in your search box. GNOME is also just a horrid experience for someone who’s transitioning from Windows.
Through some script sleuthing, I did discover that Steam ships several of its own 32-bit and 64-bit libraries, and that paths to both are added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
(search path for library files) when the client is launched by the Steam Runtime, but many files (specifically the Steam Runtime) are only present as 32-bit binaries in ~/.local/share/Steam/ubuntu12_32
.
Whether the Steam client uses those is a question someone else less sleep-deprived can answer.
I have high hopes for the Steam Controller 2. All it needs to be is a Steam Deck with the middle removed.
What if you try reaching it through your public IP?
Stupid question, but is the service reachable at all? What if you map 81 to 81? Or whichever port the other, confirmed-to-work service uses? What if you map that other service to 8100?
It’s based on hole punching, but with extras. The clients punch a hole in their respective firewalls then the service connect the holes so the clients end up communicating directly with each other. They have a lengthy blog post about NAT traversal.
Tailscale. It does some UDP fuckery to bypass NAT and firewalls (most of the time) so you don’t even need to open any ports. You can run it on individual hosts to access them directly, and/or you can set it up on one device to advertise an entire subnet and have the client work like a split tunnel VPN. I don’t know about OpenWRT, but both pfSense and OpnSense have built-in Tailscale plugins.
People are freaking out about their plan to go public, but for the moment, it’s a reliable, high quality service even on the free tier.
I’ve also used Ngrok and Twingate to access my LAN from outside, but they simply use relay servers instead of Tailscale’s black magic fuckery.
You could try using pre-9.0 wine-ge-custom or proton-ge-custom. And I’m sure someone will put the legacy Wine on the AUR.
Your dogwater arguments boil down to “it should support this specific configuration and fuck everyone else”. How is that different from a game being restricted to Windows? And how exactly does that solve the issue of still dedicating significant effort to support an even smaller set of devices?
(edit) Actually, don’t answer that. Your comment is proof of your remarkable ignorance on the topic and anything else you have to say is a waste of everyone’s time.
It makes perfect sense to do this. You have no idea how much extra work it is to maintain a Linux-native version that works predictably across the entire range of Linux machine configurations. Factorio has one guy, raiguard (hallowed be his name), in charge of the Linux build, and he wrote a blog post about the unique challenges of supporting the Linux native build.
Proton is already known to be perfectly capable of running most games as good as or even better than Windows. Game developers can defer the issue of compatibility and focus on developing the game instead of having to implement client-side decorations for GNOME users.
Perhaps there was an easier lighter-weight way of doing this?
sshuttle
does exactly that. It’s basically a VPN that uses SSH tunnelling. If you have a host in the same network as the target machine, and you can SSH into it, sshuttle
can route all TCP traffic between you and the target (or a subnet) through the host without having to bind local ports manually.
sshuttle -r ssh_server <hosts/subnets...>
Sometimes. It contains fixes for specific games and patches from wine-staging (the newest, testing branch) that are not included in Valve’s Proton releases, many of which have a positive impact on performance. The project’s overview is the best summary.