European guy, weird by default.

You dislike what I say, great. Makes the world a more interesting of a place. But try to disagree with me beyond a downvote. Argue your point. Let’s see if we can reach a consensus between our positions.

  • 13 Posts
  • 230 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • Months ago someone shared a link to a study by a swedish or norwish institute where they had done those calculations.

    Our species will top around the 11bn and slowly fall back to the 9,5/10bn, with optimist expectations. Lower numbers would be in 8/8,5bn.

    Biggest problem? Resource sharing. We are able to feed our species two fold and then some. Just eliminating bad commercial practices and food waste, would nearly double the available food, as is.

    Before, it was the rise of living standards cutting the birth rate down. Now, with poverty, inequality and automation on the rise, people have another reason to not raise families.

    Our species will shrink and fast. Faster than anyone expects. Korea, Japan, Italy, even my country, are showing fast signs of aging.

    What will they try to do? Conscript women’s uterus like Russia is, supposedly, debating? Even China is doing the math and the numbers are not good.

    We owe nothing to governments. They are our servants. People forgot about that. Allowed megalomaniac interests to takeover our lives.

    Will things get grimmer? Yes. No doubt about it. But I hope I will live to see things get better.











  • In my country, jury duty can be refused and is deemed as a role, not an obligation. It is an honor, as it is very rare to have such added role in court; takes very complex and often serious crimes. People called for it often accept but I have heard of situations where people object from personal or moral values.

    And, again, in my country, voting is not an obligation, nor legal, nor moral. It is a right and the duty to vote is considered a matter of respect towards the right that was acquired through a revolution and the individual right to be part of the political destiny of the nation, no matter how small.

    Maybe I’m splitting hairs, here, but I don’t care.

    A duty arises from a personal sense of necessity to do something. Call moral obligation if it is easier for you. Being moral relative… Obligation is determined, enforced and enforceable by law.



  • You be the judge of it:

    • punched through a tempered, textured, 3mm thick glass, leading to several cuts on a hand and wrist
    • kicked a glass panel on a door and got a nasty cust on my toe
    • several instances of cutting myself on different types of thorny bushes
    • perforation with glasses rim on my eyebrow
    • severe cut on my other eyebrow, another on the bridge of my nose
    • broken arm, twice
    • fall from a 1st floor balcony, landing on a bush, after breaking a cabinet with my back and legs, until finally reaching the ground
    • hundreds, if not thousands, of small scrapes and bruises
    • bitten by dogs, leading to deep gouges, on my calves
    • severe tear on the back of my left hand, with a broken bone, not exposed, leading to surgery
    • many, many, many sprained ankles and wrists
    • three pulled teeth plus all the bleeding from losing my baby teeth
    • minor burns on hands and fingers, from cooking
    • several nasty cuts from kitchen knives and a perforation by a lobster spike, which led to a severe infection, with a piece of lobster shell stuck underneath a finger nail
    • a few near choking to death episodes
    • two electrocussion incidents (230V), for mere seconds


  • I’m not against supporting a software in a recurring form but the web browser is essentially the lock and key of accessing the entirery of what exists outside your machine.

    That would garner an immense power to whichever entity developing one. Remember Microsoft and the IE case.

    Firefox is not perfect and apparently on a downwards spiral but what made it stand out was because it wanted to be free and for all. Chrome is far from being a good thing.


  • The Mafia and most, if not all organized crime syndicates, started as a way for people to defend themselves from abusive governments, officials, etc. Mafia thrives by getting along with people, not openly prey on them.

    Syndicates also tend to be patriotic, in the sense that they are defending or at least looking to preserve their interests where they are rooted.

    Mafia tends to arbour great disdain for police and similar forces. They can be useful if bribeable or somehow coherced to look the other way but they are still police. The enemy.

    I’ll give you an extreme example.

    In Brasil, the Comando Vermelho is one of the largest, if not te largest, criminal organization on the country. They are well known for their extremely violent and cruel methods. Yet they are the biggest employers in the areas they control. They build schools, pay people for their work (mostly unrelated to criminal activities), distribute food, run clinics. They act as de facto police, courts and punishers, to keep peace. They nearly replace the state because the state nearly abandoned the poorest of poor, amongst who they set grounds, in the favelas.

    I can’t imagine the resistance they would pose to an invading force.

    And, I can’t confirm this, but I have a memory of reading somewhere that during WW2, the Mafia helped the Allies infiltrate areas.