• 2 Posts
  • 246 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2024

help-circle

  • 1.2" by 2100 with no acceleration from global warming

    That is 0.3mm per year. Current annual sea rise is 4.5mm.

    The danger of twaites is sudden collapse/detachment, giving an immediate 2 foot rise. Mostly global sea rise from other sources is what can raise melt from glacier, and accelerate its time of detachment.

    For the first time in satellite history, 2022 to 2025 was 4 consecutive sub 2.5m km2 antarctic sea ice extents, and were closer to 2m km2 , 2026 was still below 2.6m km2 . Until now, global warming has not caused visible downtrends in Antarctic sea ice. year to year variation was in a narrow range with no noticeable trend.

    Twaites is a region that is subject regularly to blue water events every year. A trend for Antarctic that leads to longer and wider blue water areas on coastal lines is also a recipe for warmer water to interact with Twaites. Returning every year will accelerate the “doomsday glacier” event, in addition to exposing other regional glaciers who, previously to last 5 years, did not get consecutive blue water erosion, which meant recovery years/periods.

    Talking about Twaites as though, “if things stay the same, an insignificant number may double” is not the right way to be concerned about Twaites.


  • I don’t think it can substantially reduce diesel prices prior to midterm unless it encourages US refineries to go even harder as if $6+ diesel retail wasn’t already enough for them to go full out. You’re right that diesel export capacity for Russia will take a while to rebuild.

    Just like he’s been claiming the Iran war will end right after the midterms

    There’s 2 general possibilities for “ending” Iran war after rather than, with bonus points for elections, prior to midterms.

    1. Respectful sincere peace with Iran, all the while declaring victory as US forces leave. This raises questions about just how victorious the US is. The reason this path can’t be chosen before midterms is “Iran failure/impotence” is neither a good look, nor a reason to vote for the diaper licker candidates.

    2. War escalation under theory that this will force Iran to beg to surrender. “end of war” prediction comes from more probable war until 2028 election…

    I doubt US establishment is capable of peace with Iran, and so option 2 is only desired path. Still there are 2 huge obstacles.

    1. Democrats sweep both houses in midterms. War powers, and war budget not passed. Impeachment in the air.

    2. even if GOP rigs a win, a $700B military budget increase will have bond markets revolt harder. Global economic collapse is already teethering. There is no war path, or pretense of super power status, that ends well for US/global economy.

    Pressures to end the war (just leave with big victory speech) are inescapable. Fucking it up hasn’t stopped US before.








  • begs

    He has ordered colonies to withdraw from their diesel reserves under threat of cutting off their diesel imports. The colonial slaves are being forced to not maintain reserves as the US is telegraphing making a global financial crisis worse and permanent. The US brags about their economic success during this collapse by saying they have destroyed the rest of the world far worse than they are destroying the US.

    Colonial slaves are not critical of illegal Iran war for Israel, and are not demanding the removal of the US from NATO, or end to war.



  • Israel had to stop bombing Lebanon.

    It’s a mistake for Iran to ask for that as part of deal, because US/Trump do not have direct authority over Israel. Iran has no direct authority over Hezbolah, Hamas, or Al Ansaralah, and its too big of an ask to force US and Israel to become enemies over that element of the deal. Israel only cares about destroying Iran at whatever costs to US/world it entails, so that there is no longer any opposition to greater Israel future conquest plans, and it just sets them up to veto any negotiated deal.

    The first ceasefire deal included the US handing Iran $300 billion

    The $300B was investments/reconstruction in Iran offered by GCC states.