I’m pretty sure “Gimp marketing” didn’t come up with this one.

A Gimp is someone in a (Gimp) suit with holes, usually in a submissive role.

Though if GIMP ever switched to QT that would be nuts. Once the reason and naming influence for the GTK behind GNOME.

They could call it QIMP and release QtTK and make Gnome switch to Qt and rename to QNOME 😍

For me it’s space efficient. What’s up with all the white space everywhere else? Do you have the same issue with Blender?

DevOps here. I still really like programming and systems administration, but I’m so burnt out I can’t do anything anymore after 8h+ of work. It has gotten to the point that I hate computers so much, I favor going out into nature over fixing my broken Linux install of my desktop for several months now. I’d love to write software again but my brain can’t do it.

Yeah, one of my issues with it. It’s a browser app in a non-browser corset, like so many modern “apps”…

Lemmy is social media.

Yes, basically. Fits my workflow as I usually use bullet lists anyway. You can hide the bullet points and have it be just blocks, in the backend (MD file) it’s still bullets though.

I’m using Logseq and it’s the least bad of the FOSS options I tried so far.

I am not going to argue with an AI, as you even write your comments with AI. Start being human and I’ll talk to you. Else I could just type my responses into ChatGPT and skip you as human API.

You have a studio Ghibli avatar, how do you think that makes you look when you rant about AI?

You should’ve simply made this a talk at a conference.

Instead you decided to have an AI write a mini-book (there are telltale signs like “this is not x, this is y” sentences) and tagged a few accounts who have reach.

Is this ragebait or are you serious? Is there a possibility you’re currently mentally unwell? There’s this issue called “AI psychosis” and I’d hate to have witnessed such a thing. If you think the AI speaks to you personally, please do not do what it says and instead get help from a professional or reach out to friends and family and listen to their consensus.

No one does that in a project they’re building for themselves.

Speak for yourself, I always did that and I found it easier with LLMs nowadays.

I hate most AI shite with a passion but when it helps my colleagues write commits which are more than “add stuff”, “fix some things” I’m fine with it.

I rarely use AI to generate code, usually only when I need a starting point. It’s much easier to unfuck AI code than to stare blankly at a screen for an hour. I’d never commit code I don’t fully understand or have read to the last byte.

I hope OP is doing the same. LLMs fail at 90% of coding tasks for me but for the other 10% (mostly writing tests, readmes, boilerplate) it’s really OK for productivity.

Ethics of LLMs aside, if you use them for exactly what they’re built for – being a supercharged glorified autocomplete – they’re cool. As soon as you try to use them for something else like “autocompletion from zero” aka “creativity”, they fail spectacularly.

wars*, he’s fighting multiple fronts and supplying multiple sides with weapons.

Then it wouldn’t click though, as a capacitive sensor is not the same as a button. If you engineered something like an optomechanical switch it could still fail at the mechanical part.

You could however use a touchpad instead of a mouse.

Why

Taylor Swift.

Schmitt (Germany)

Or Müller (=Miller)

Fixed

Weird al explained it well

Where?

Why not codeberg?

^please ^donate