grander environmental reasons

No. Humans are not separate from “nature”.

Know the terrible intentions of “environmentalists” who would put you in battery cages.

Edit: Apparently, this touched a nerve. Let me say this: my experience with actually existing urbanism was a repulsive, mind numbing waste of several years that probably took even more years off of my life due to air/noise/light pollution. I have no problem with the concept of living near other humans- but I see few examples of such in my country that I could tolerate.

Blackmail?

“Source available” grifter.

Yes.

At least is a heavy lifting qualifier in this case.

the main issue is

Sure. But I’ve seen quite a bit of push back against rust from these sorts even outside the kernel.

Can someone distill the good faith argument against rust? Is there one?

deleted by creator

No. It is an unneeded waste of resources spent by anti-human perverts.

The actual purpose is to parse surveillance data for the capitalist class.

No. We are not.

With typical capitalist efficiency, the titans of industry are going to boil off half an ocean in an ignorant attempt to simulate a human brain that requires what, about 2 kilowatt-hours of relatively clean chemical energy a day?

Never mind there being no shortage of said brains.