DerGottesknecht

Nah, our police has a well known issue with brutality, every leftist already experienced that. But our conservatives are always talking it down as “Einzelfälle” but everyone else knows its a systemic issue.

Uma delicia ;) But they were serving 7.62s to the russians for sure, there was a lot of combat footage coming from the Kreminna Forest where they were holding the line.

In addition to all the other valid arguments I want to also mention the rotation principle of the ukrainians. They deploy for six months to the Frontline and then rotate between the dugouts and a safehouse for two weeks at a time. So their soldiers have time to relax and eat good food even while deployed which keeps morale high.

Russia used to just keep their common troops on the frontline until they were exhausted. If I recall correctly they changed this in the last months, but they most likely lost almost all of their pre war trained troops.

I heard of a bunch of Brazilians fighting in the international legion.

On 1 December, Vučić made a statement following a similar incident in which he questioned whether the driver should be held responsible and arrested. He said the man was “going his way” and added, “Those who claim that such drivers should be arrested should splash their faces with cold water.”

If you don’t see this as encouraging then I can’t help you.

In serbia there were several instances of people driving into anti vucic demonstrations.

The complainants claim that Vučić previously encouraged motorists to drive through crowds of protesting students.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/serbias-vucic-under-fire-after-driver-rams-student-protest-in-belgrade/

It seems you just need an authority figur and willing followers.

they haven’t been caught with anything openly anti-constitutional.

The federal party is suspected to be anti constitutional and several state level partys have been declared as anti constitutional by the Verfassungsschutz, so that’s not completely true.

That works only for a small amount of renewables. Who gets to produce if there is more production than consumption?

• Risk (People feared it since Three Mile Island and Tschernobyl)
• nuclear Trash, Germanys states still cant say where there should be storage, except not in their state.

That were the main reasons around the 2000s when it was decided for the first time and that was generally consensus in the population.

And they don’t work well with renewables, where did you get that from? NPPs want to continually run, cause most of their cost is in construction, so you don’t want to shut them down. And they are limited in the flexibility of power ramping by thermal loads and stresses, which causes cracks in pipes if you power them up and down all the time.

We did cut coal usage in half anyway since 1990, but by using renewables.

And before you say we could be coalfree then, nuclear and renewables don’t work well together, because a built nuclear power plant has no economic motivation to shut down if there’s a lot of renewables active. The best solution to get carbon emissions down (if a state doesn’t have nukes) is and will be until fusion works, renewables and storage.

Should have, but thats just not possible with the political support for coal and miners at the time. The greens wanted to phase out coal too, but with social democrats & conservatives there was never a chance.

And also nuclear was never as big as coal and gas in Germany, so it was realistically never an option. Even at the peak the generation was only half of what coal produced.

Those two things are not related.

There is a European energy market, so the electricity always comes from the cheapest producer. Germany has enough reserves to bridge gaps, but doesn’t use them if there is cheaper energy on the market.