Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2024

help-circle


  • Do we need to remind people that LLMs don’t actually have a brain, and really, really shouldn’t be in charge of anything with real life implications?

    They aren’t actually doing a cost-benefit analysis on the use of Nuclear weapons. They’re not weighing up the cost of winning vs. the casualties. They’re literally not made for that.

    They are trained to know words, and how those words link in with other words. They’re essentially like kids doing escalation of imaginary weapons, and to them nuclear bombs are just a weapon particularly associated with being strong and deadly.


  • You mean to tell me that all these years of the UK Gov refusing to increasing the NHS’s budget to match inflation - in effect cutting their budget - has resulted in worse care outcomes, as it incentivises shorting on staff and cutting corners to meet targets?

    Writing rules and procedures can’t get you out of a problem caused by said rules and procedures not being followed due to external pressures.

    The UK Gov loves to fixate on dealing with symptoms rather than the actual problems behind them, then goes all Surprised Pikachu when their “fixes” don’t work. It’s been the same routine for decades now.



  • So why did ICE detain her, and keep her locked up for so long? A possible answer began to emerge over the weeks she was incarcerated. As Karen got to know the guards at the Northwest ICE Processing Center where she was held, she kept hearing the same thing from them: that ICE officers are paid a bonus every time they detain someone. “Individual ICE agents get money per head that they detain – the guards told me that,” Karen says.

    It’s no secret that the Trump administration has been pouring money into ICE. Its annual budget – $6bn a decade ago – is now $85bn; ICE is now the highest -funded law enforcement agency in the US. Since last August, new recruits can expect to receive a signing-on bonus of up to $50,000. Karen’s experience has left her convinced that ICE agents are being given even more incentives – to arrest and detain anyone they possibly can, even blameless tourists who have all the paperwork they need to be in the US.

    Knew they had sign-up bonuses, but had no idea that ICE agents were also given a bonus for locking people up - that’s an absolutely perverse incentive for a job that should be as objective as possible.

    No wonder innocent people are getting dragged off to detention centres (or worse), it literally pays for them to shoot now and ask questions later.

    Also, the US government has $80 billion to throw at bloodthirsty hounds, but had to send DOGE to scrounge through various agencies to find a few billion? Something doesn’t quite add up there, almost like the incentive wasn’t finding money.



  • Looks like the US is intent on starting this year with a bang.

    The list is HUGE and spans across so many agencies and so many disciplines it’s absurd.

    I mean FFS does Donny J actually mean to tell us that the “Science and Technology Center in Ukraine” runs contrary to US interests?

    If that’s actually true - that doesn’t spell good things for the US’s future intentions for Ukraine.


    Also a few of these are rather telling of the current trajectory of the US’s policies:

    • Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals, and Sustainable Development;

    • Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services;

    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    • International Renewable Energy Agency;

    • International Union for Conservation of Nature;

    • UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries;

    For starters this is a metric fuck tonne of environmental initiatives to pull out of, and shows the Republican-led US is going to be making a generational push towards screwing over the environment.


    … And then some other notable initiatives:

    • Freedom Online Coalition;

    • Global Forum on Migration and Development;

    • Global Counterterrorism Forum;

    • International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property;

    • International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance;

    • International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law;

    • UN International Law Commission;

    • UN International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals;

    • UN International Trade Centre;

    • UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children in Armed Conflict; Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict; and Secretary-General on Violence Against Children;

    • UN Democracy Fund;

    • UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women;

    It’s rather concerning how many of the councils the US is pulling out from relate to international law, upholding democracy, and to human rights in general.






  • For her part, the chancellor told BBC News that she thought “sustainable aviation and economic growth go hand in hand"

    As said in the article, the technology to reasonably decarbonise planes doesn’t really exist yet - so the only path to “sustainable aviation” is to reduce it to the point it can be properly offset by other decarbonisation efforts.

    That makes these two concepts almost entirely mutually exclusive without proper planning, and just slapping multiple airport expansions down then saying “It’s fine, we’ll plant a few trees at some point” doesn’t fucking cut it.






  • Well in that sense you’re breaking the law of your land by commenting on such a forum since we’re on the high seas here if you didn’t notice?

    I’m aware of where I am, as I said before I have no problem with piracy - my main point was that just because we’re fine with it, doesn’t just magically make it legal - which is what you were implying.

    And no, I didn’t intend to be rude if you’re inferring that but it’s blatantly clear what this forum is for and them being employed by someone who purports to protect their privacy selling such a service but then feigning ignorance

    Feigning ignorance of what? That it’s probably not the greatest idea to be flogging around your actual IP address while doing potentially illegal/unlawful activities?

    From my PoV, @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de wasn’t feigning ignorance, the question was a retort to a non-sequitur. One’s view on the validity of laws (i.e. only being illegal cause Disney said so) doesn’t change them - I’ve seen enough “Sov Cits” find that out the hard way to not make that stupid mistake.