PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]

Alt account of PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org for when SDF Lemmy is doing its monthly dive 😆.

  • 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 9th, 2026

help-circle
  • This is the main french Lemmy instance using a luxembourg domain.

    Excellent. Unfortunately I don’t have a burning Luxembourg flag on hand, but thankfully I can now respond with a burning flag emoji. So fuck Fr*nce and their settler-colonialist laws too. france-cool 💩

    Who the fuck are you to decide who gets to live or die ?

    Why don’t you apply that exact same indignation to the State?

    Also I guess killing in self-defense isn’t a thing? Because the capitalists attack us, all of us, the whole goddamn planet, every hour of every day with their destruction.

    Also also, the exact point I’m making is that you don’t have to kill people to participate in a revolution.

    Everything else

    sicko-yes cope



  • In my country, your comment would be illegal.

    Which as an anarchist means I’m doing something right anarchy

    Edit: wait a minute, your instance is a .lu, i.e. Luxembourg?!? Like your government is simultaneously a monarchy and a tax haven. Of course my ideas are fucking illegal there! It’s everything I fucking despise! I shit on your government and all their laws, and I take their condemnation as the utmost praise. 💩💩💩💩

    I dont care what your ideology is. I do see your wish for violence and extra-judicial killings and it disgusts me.

    Counterpoint: judicial killings are just extra-judicial killings with extra steps.

    I wish for the minimum possible amount of violence in the transition to anarchy. It’s not my goddamn fault that the capitalists are so fucking vile that they won’t let us do this without violence.

    So many criminals against humanity thought they were doing their massacres for a good fight, that it was necessary. You are just the same.

    AmeriKKKa: “I want to destroy everyone and everything that isn’t profitable.”

    antifa: “I’m willing to use violence to stop them.”

    LIB: “I literally cannot tell the difference.”

    I wish you could express your ideas without the need to encourage violence.

    Yeah and I wish the capitalists didn’t constantly deploy the fucking militaries and police of the world to constantly destroy people and subjugate the masses, and people in Hell want ice water. We’re gonna have to fight these fuckers. Tough shit.

    I find even more pathetic that you encourage others to do the violence for you.

    Because we can’t do this shit alone.

    PS : you can be a revolutionary without being violent.

    Yes that is exactly my point. You don’t personally have to be violent to contribute to a revolution. You just need to learn to collaborate with the people who are willing to do violence. I support a diversity of tactics…but sometimes, we gotta fight.


  • Until the vast majority go out and become their own personal Luigi Mangione, nothing will get done.

    I love the fire, and there’s definitely gonna be a need for some more Luigi’s to carry out those exceptional tasks that don’t benefit from “too many cooks”, but IMO we need the proletarian majority to organize and collaborate to overthrow the system. So we don’t necessarily need a majority of people to actually go out and fight (but we do definitely need some!); we need a majority to collaborate with a sufficient number of people who do carry out violent actions for proletarian emancipation. ancom-heart




  • If you think someone deserves to die, then people are also allowed to think you deserve to die.

    Yeah I literally don’t care if you think or even outright say I deserve to die. It’s literally not a speech issue. It’s about the implication that one plans to act on those things.

    For example, when a fascist or an anticommunist liberal says “PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S should die for being an anarcho-communist”, it’s their right to say that and, in isolation, I wouldn’t care. And I basically never do act on these threats. The issue is that there is both a historical precedent and current practice of fascists and anticommunist liberals acting on their threats.

    If one says to me “PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S’s kids deserve to die of cancer in a school shooting”… that has no teeth in reality. I have no kids, and even if I did, one can’t give them cancer, and the person would just be mentioning school shootings to be edgy. It’s just some asshole babbling on the Internet.

    And for this reason, I actually do understand why billionaires crack down on anti-capitalist speech in practice: because it will strip of their power, and possibly their lives if they keep up their horseshit. I simply do not care about billionaires and their monstrous desires. From their perspective, the threat posed by anti-capitalists is real…but billionaires have brought it on themselves, and they can easily fix this by voluntarily surrendering their control, telling their militaries to back off, and giving control of the means of production to the workers.

    Like yes, I absolutely do want to make the “nice” billionaires you mentioned no longer billionaires. If they’re really so “nice”, then violence should not need to be an option.