

You’d be surprised
You’d be surprised
I explained why. Misconfiguration and caching.
You would also need to clear your device’s DNS cache.
Not two A records. From what I understand, OP has an A record pointing to their public IP address (which Nginx is listening on behind a NAT). Then, on the local network, OP uses their own DNS server to ignore that entry and instead always serve the local IP when a host on the LAN queries it.
Aside from OP’s devices potentially using a different DNS server (I was only able to solve it for my stock Android by dropping outgoing DNS in my firewall), this solution is a nightmare for roaming devices like mobile phones. Such a device might cache the DNS answer while on LAN or WAN respectively and then try to continue using that address when the device moves to the other network segment.
These are the most likely scenarios in my opinion - OP’s devices are ignoring the hacky DNS rewrite (either due to using a different DNS server or due to caching) and try to access the server via the public IP. This is supported by the connection timeout, which is exactly what you would see when your gateway doesn’t do loopback.
Never point your DNS at two different IP addresses like this. It will only cause you pain and unexpected behaviour.
What you are experiencing is solved by so-called “NAT reflection” or “NAT loopback”. It’s a setting that - in the optimal case - you should just be able to activate on the appropriate interface on your gateway.
If you do not have that setting or do not have access to the edge router, but only some intermediate router, you can do a nasty hack. You can point static routes to your public IP address to point at your local IP address instead. In that case, you also need to tell your server to accept packets with your public IP address as the destination.
Is the Euro bad because it’s only accepted within the Eurozone?
Your cat must be in on the conspiracy. Perhaps even part of the deep state.
One Luigi a day, keeps the Spez away.
Yes, but Macron tried to explain to him that taking these funds is illegal.
Wieso passiert das auf einmal so gut wie monatlich.
In my mind I excused it ask having low but constant volume of users.
The graphs are relative to each medium. You can’t directly compare the popularity of different apps from this image.
Edit: Here you can compare them to each other yourself:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Pinterest%2CTiktok&hl=en
You can see that 100% of one app in this post doesn’t equal 100% of another app.
Autocorrection but let’s say it was deliberate.
Can he please stop sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong. Being a US president isn’t enough. He wants to be the German chancellor and British PB now, too?
Doesn’t help they pick the oldest guys in the room to become the pope.