Paraquat is probably the single most toxic herbicide on the market and it should absolutely be banned.

The bubble can’t pop until there’s sufficient housing, or a major economic collapse.

It’s almost like decision-making might be impacted after the country’s entire leadership structure was murdered.

But seriously I think there is a strategy here, which is causing Maximum economic chaos and pain the hopes that Trump will chicken out. It’s not a bad short term strategy but angering other nations may come with longer term downsides.

But I thought a few murders was all that was holding us back from a spontaneous revolution? /s

Fairly likely if the current political climate continues. Could be a big boon for Lemmy honestly, if we’ve got the porn and no one else does.

God damn he got old.

Sure. When they’re done there won’t be a need for any more ethnic cleansing.

So is this a “let them fight” situation or what?

So I own one of these vehicles and I was thinking there’s no way this can be because I can see my fuel consumption and it is very low. But according to the article it varies greatly by model, and mine was mentioned as being on the low end.

For me at least, I can hear when the engine turns on and it does not do so until the battery range is used up, so there should be no fuel usage during short trips. It seems quite strange that some vehicles would work otherwise.

I don’t believe it’s a physical blockade but threats of sanctions against anyone who provides them with oil.

Historically the US funded a lot of important medical research. Do you think they did this for altruistic reasons?

Similarly, healthcare is beneficial to the state to keep workers healthy.

States do many things, good and bad, but none just out of the goodness of their hearts.

True. It’s a state. I can’t think of a time a state did something for purely altruistic reasons.

Wow I rarely say this about Chinese government but based.

These automated bans based on where you post are the dumbest way to run subs.

lol I meant like for Jews only insofar as it’s for everyone, and it’s for Jews because they are a subset of everyone. But that’s a stretch so I see why you were confused.

Ah, what could have been…

And I don’t have any problem with that. The issue is when they decide to enhance that distinctly Jewish character by expelling or killing everyone who is different from them. That’s called fascism.

How can it be “for Jews” but also be inclusive of non-Jews? That’s the whole problem.

Unless you mean for Jews in that it’s for everyone who wants to live there and participate in such a society. But that’s not what they typically mean when they say “for Jews”.

So unbelievably petty…

Not me but apparently they’ve confirmed they’re looking into this “glitch”.