

No, just for fun
they/them
No, just for fun
That glyph post D in our ABC
It was vital to call on my LLM, it couldn’t do it on its own, and my script can just count glyphs, not anything to do with words.
I had to instruct it to consult a script to know how many words did contain fifth glyphs, but it did work with that.
It’s good at paraphrasing paragraphs to contain no ‘fifth glyphs’
My sibling asked me to ‘come out’ from a specific place, and I, jokingly replied ‘Ok, I’m bi!’
no reaction
Not even from my parents who were in the room at the same time (for context my younger siblings were like 10 or something)
Later, I causally mentioned in conversation that I was bi and nonbinary, so my mother told me ‘everyone’s a little bit bi’ and that being nonbinary was a mental health disorder or possibly a figment of my imagination, although they’re a bit more supportive now, I think they still think those things.
Oh, and I told my friends and they were like ‘that’s cool, I’m LGBT+ too!’
Green Mars - Kim Stanley Robinson
You’re free to not use them, if you want. But me and many others are going to appreciate that these alternatives that don’t rely on centralised cervices exist, that won’t track credit scores, personal information, or use tech companies with privacy and freedom concerns.
I’m a trans person, so I think I feel qualified to say that people can’t choose who they’re attracted to - race, gender, sex, age, etc - but I also don’t think we need words for every specific sexuality. Straight, gay, and bi seem good enough, and you can qualify that (I’m gay and only attracted to black people, I’m bi but only for people older than me, I’m straight but only for people that are either cis or trans and have had bottom surgery).
Not to be confused with absolute Unix
Someone on Reddit asked the same question a while ago, and there are many links to meme generators, but I couldn’t find the answer unfortunately
It prevents others (the government, moderators, social media platforms, parents) controlling the narrative and allows challenging those in authority. It enables minority opinions to be put out and considered by the majority.
Any detriments are mainly ‘people are rude’, but that’s not reason enough to outlaw free speech, given the costs of doing so
I don’t eat meat. So I wouldn’t go to a chicken shop. So none.
That other people seem to be misunderstanding your question, just providing examples of men with positive masculinity (although I would say Iroh is a good one, on that topic), rather than resources for men to become better more positively masculine. Is that what you mean, correct?
Spoiler tag doesn’t work, you created a quote instead.
Use this syntax
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
hidden content
:::
I don’t follow some laws, mainly copyright related ones as it goes against my personal morals and there is no punishment.
If a law is immoral and there is punishment, I would conform out of fear, but want to protest it.
If a law is moral, then great!
I’m not so conceited as to imagine I haven’t internalised any external morals from authority, majority, or religion, but whenever I actually consciously reflect on my morals, the only one that seems to matter is what I think is moral, not what others do.
It would be interesting to talk to Decartes, but I don’t speak Français, so it would have to be… idk… Nick Bostrom would be interesting
I block every instance with ‘porn’ in the name
You can browse it from Voyager with an account on another instance
I think most birth doctors know how to help a trans man give birth.