The warrant enables the supplier to advertise that they supply to the royal family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_royal_warrant_holders_of_the_British_royal_family

I wasn’t arguing for the existence of god.

Let me break this down:

• “There is a god.” --> Burden of proof
• “There is no god.” --> Burden of proof
• “Hey, man. I don’t know.” —> No burden of proof

You have made the assertion, thus you have the burden of proof.

“what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” QED

Careful, many online atheists don’t understand that they have to prove a negative. That they have to prove the assertion: “There is no god.”

The default position is that there is yet insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion.

Edit: Thank you for the downvotes, you have provided me with further evidence that online atheists don’t understand that they have to prove a negative. Your butthurt fuels me.