Maybe it just wasn’t a good fit, which is fine. People don’t always fit into the job they take and being let go gives you the ability to find something new.

Most instances of Lemmy have a very low opinion of AI. You aren’t going to find AI recommendations here.

Also, regarding music, a lot of music theory is used in the writing of opera and musicals. AI could write music for you, but you wouldn’t be able to critique the output to make a decent opera. People educated in music would be able to tell what is missing/wrong and people without this education would still likely be and to tell that doesn’t hit.

A lot of times in my career. It turns out people will ask you to do things that aren’t necessary all the time without wanting to pay for it. There are also a lot of times it is better to choose the quicker and less accurate way to do something since it will show the basic feasibility.

So only Jesus can define blasphemy?

You dismissed a highly ranked and influential religious leader because you didn’t agree with the take. This isn’t a crank, but someone who had a large congregation and was influential in one of the larger religious organizations in the USA. It goes back to my argument of defining blasphemy. If a major pastor says something is is blasphemous, did that require a warning?

If you’re just going to find any religious nutso to make your argument, I don’t think you’re really arguing in good faith.

Jerry Falwell was a significant Baptist pastor who had a large congregation. He founded a college and also was a significant conservative activist. You could say he was problematic, but he was a significant religious leader.

So you’re going to have to flag Teletubbies as blasphemous, since Jerry Falwell publicly condemned the show due to Tinky Winky.

The flip side to your argument is what would be decided as blasphemy. A Mormon blasphemy could be different than a Catholic blasphemy but under the same warning.

I can see that happening, people shifting their political leanings when accepting the new economic class they are in.

Yeah, it feels you’re giving others time when they won’t give it back. When you say you do so without causing a flight or conflict, maybe do so. Your time is valuable and also maybe they need to hear what they don’t want to hear.

Is there? Most electrical maps I’ve seen are that the poorer parts of the country are supporting Lula while the richer parts are supporting Bolsonaro.

What time and energy are spending?

Edit: I’m asking for examples because there are several things it can be. Right now, part of it may be that you’re setting yourself on fire to keep others warm, then you’re angry that your response isn’t reciprocal.

Regarding travel, it isn’t typical for US defaultism for Americans traveling abroad. However, not typical doesn’t mean that it doesn’t happen in some forms.

Regarding currency, a lot of countries and regions will take American currency. Some smaller Caribbean countries peg their dollars to the American dollar 1:1. Some touristy regions around the world will also take American currency, usually at inflated prices. Or, you may have a tourist who has run out of the local currency and only has American cash on hand. It isn’t typical, but it likely happens and everyone remembers the few idiots who don’t know that France uses Euros.

Regarding language, it can be stressful for some to be in an area where people are speaking in a language you don’t understand, especially if you are used to people only speaking your language. Yelling “Speak English” could be someone having a panic attack or just expressing frustration that they can’t interact with society like they could at home. Sure, there is likely some racism and ignorance wrapped up in that. However, I’m providing an explanation, not an excuse.

Regarding your comment regarding the Internet, US defaultism generally happens as Americans are a plurality of English speaking people on several major platforms and a lot of news in non-English speaking countries is usually written in the local language and discussed in the local language. So, the assumption is generally that the person is American, especially if they are taking a point of view somewhat in line with American politics.

I’ve seen a lot of angry comments from too online leftists on Lemmy telling the person they are talking with that they hope the other person dies in a fire as America falls, with the response being “I’m not American”.

A lot of people understand American politics because it is written in the language in which the Internet was developed and so much is written. Without other context clues, people may not see that someone within the boundaries of American politics may be from another country.

What makes you feel like you’re putting in effort?

I’ve complained about this, but I don’t know if it is Bommers only. I’ve seen a lot of Gen Alpha with shy dicks as well.

You can be nice, but establish boundaries. You don’t have to set yourself on fire to keep others warm.

Going for a walk is generally a good thing.

In-N-Out can only place restaurants in certain locations due to internal supply chain limitations. I haven’t confirmed it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if their food was sourced locally because of it.

Go down a hyperfocus rabbit hole.