I do agree it’s an odd choice not to fix it, and I do wish they would. But for now it’s a risk I’m fine with taking. If my server gets DOSd in the future from multiple unauthenticated streams I sure will be a grumpy git and complain to them, but in the mean time uuh… sharing is caring? 😅

I think you’ve fundamentally misunderstood some of their communication.

There’s the issue I described earlier where it is possible to stream files unauthenticated if you know the folder structure on the video. The devs have responded that they won’t fix this. Outside of streaming content, there’s no other access through this mean. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/1501

Then there’s the release of 10.11.7 that fixed a number of security issues. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.7 with no major security issues since then. And all the issues were privilagr escalation for a normal user account on jellyfin. So the attacker would already needed to have an account on your server, and only the data that jellyfin could see was at risk, nothing escaped contagion so to say.

They also officially support a reverse proxy set up: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/reverse-proxy/.

I have no idea where you’ve got the idea where they themselves claim it’s unsecure to open it to the internet. Of course there’s always a risk associated with exposing something, but jellyfin doesn’t pose any larger risk than anything else you might publish.

Do you have any proof that it’s not secure?

Unfortunately for a Plex style easy to share library you need it to be centralized, handing over a lot of power to whoever is controlling it.

Why not? Unless you’re talking about unauthenticated steaming of media if you reverse engineer a servers folder structure.

While I don’t actually know if codeberg does have back up codes or not, I imagine they do and I’m quietly calling OP out for not saving them 😁

I had a scary situation once when changing my email address for my bitwarden account and didn’t think ahead that they’d probably log me out on all devices. Luckily I have a copy of all codes in an accessible place.

Do they not give you a recovery phrase or back up codes when you’re enable 2FA?

Tailscale has an option for OIDC. That should be avoiding the tech mafia enough no?

You had an acceptable view of things, right up until the second to last sentence. People were absolutely beat and jailed for “obscene” behavior, including just being gay. But maybe that is what you mean with common sense.

I’m not entirely sure in the war part, the bible does make it pretty clear the Abrahamic people are totes the best people, so I’m sure it’s in there. But there is a whole lot of breed like rabbits in there. It’s why Islamic and conservative/traditional christians make having babies a core part of their values.

Colloquially I think the distinction is the war started in 2014, but became full invasion in 2022.

Why wouldn’t people up vote? The original comment said the main article was worse than the headline, and summarised why they thought so. What are you objecting to?

Why would you say Rome specifically you third Reich wanna be 😂 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_graffiti

Good thing SponsorBlock will automatically skip the segments for you so you can enjoy the 20 minutes long video!

Skit

Oh yeah. Tbf, I had the same thought when I read the post as well. “This is very big brother, but good?”

Except you own everything generated by yourself and you’re not being exploited for someone else’s profit.

I had hoped the pandemic denial would be a western phenomena. Too mass media brain rotted with strong political backing to think clearly. I know even things like the Spanish flu had their deniers back in the day, but I thought ebola would be visually and immediate enough that it would be taken seriously.

And what plans were there for Ukraine to join NATO prior to the invasion? None? Zero? The deal was already that Ukraine was a neutral buffer zone so the big strong USSR wouldn’t wet their underwear? Did ruzzia show their hand that no country is safe from an invasion regardless of if their in NATO or not? Yes I think they did! They did show they are warmongering dictators.

You’re just a right wing psy op to repress the birth of future left leaning voters! /s (I got inspired by recent comments I’ve seen)

But it’s an interesting idea that could royally screw with a country if followed through. But I think it has abysmal chances of actually happening. Choosing to not have kids when a couple is both willing and able is an incredibly large sacrifice to those that want kids. And you wouldn’t see if such a strike worked until 9 months later (or a not earlier since there wouldn’t be as many pregnancy scans).