

The chairman of the joint chiefs literally told our two tv hosts that are running this war that it was an exceedingly bad idea.
And it seems we’ve come to the point where the bully fucked with the wrong kid.
Artist, musical performer, and former derby skater from the Midwest.
I’m single, childless, and married to freedom and adventure.
ACAB, Anti-War, and I hate Democrats, Republicans, and billionaires. (Yes, even your favorite billionaire: the pop star, the legendary athlete, or the soft-spoken investment guru.)
Also, I refuse to use Donald’s last name out of hatred for the man and his brand, FYI.


The chairman of the joint chiefs literally told our two tv hosts that are running this war that it was an exceedingly bad idea.
And it seems we’ve come to the point where the bully fucked with the wrong kid.


Planes falling out of the sky, no munitions, and the two guys running the war are unqualified TV hosts.
This is fine. Everything is fine.


Smart.
Slip one to Palestine so we can get the Gaza War ended. Mutually-assured destruction is the only deterrent that will work.


I love how Democrats suddenly pretend to care about these things once leadership changes.
All I heard from you for four years were excuses for genocide.


they were making statements about tempering Israel’s approach
LOL, they made statements about Israel’s approach for four years… but supported every single thing those murderers did. Their words are meaningless because when Benny tells them to jump, they jump.
And when Benny told them to bomb Iran, they’d have done it.


Probably not the first thing we need to worry about when reporting on the Catholic Church. Also, we know just how much value a vow from a Catholic person has from the thousands of years of enthusiastic participation in child trafficking.


How so?
Biden and Harris went along with child genocide and a state-engineered famine. They would 100% bomb Iran if Benny told them to.


I appreciate that you put “defensive” in air quotes, like you should.


Not ‘unlawful annexation measures’.
“Raiding” or maybe “Raping and Pillaging” is more appropriate.


They’re not going to do anything, not because they’re powerless, but because they’re bought off by AIPAC and support the war too, and not only that, they have a maniacal leader in charge willing to take all of the heat off of them by acting without Congress and giving them plausible deniability. It’s a dream scenario if you’re an AIPAC-bribed legislator.


You’ve just demonstrated my favorite excuse from Dems.
“It’s okay that they don’t do anything because opposition is hard, and it might not work anyway, so why do anything?”


He started this war for two reasons: Israel told him to, and if he failed to act, they were going to expose the extent of his crimes against children as recorded in the Epstein files.


I think that’s incorrect.
Donald became inevitable when the Democratic Party opted to rule in a manner that didn’t distinguish them from the Republicans in any meaningful way. “We” didn’t let him do anything. “We” exist in a country where absent a billion dollar fortune or membership in the Epstein Class, you have no power whatsoever to effect change outside of your local municipality.


Wild how the small innovation of just changing terminology completely allowed presidents to get around the law.
Under Obama, civilians became: “Enemy or Unarmed Combatants”. Under Bush, torture became “enhanced interrogation” and kidnapping became “extraordinary rendition”. Under Clinton war became “peacekeeping operation”. They all loved using the term “air strike” instead of “bombing” or “settlers” instead of “murderers and rapists”.
I hate that it works, but it works.


This is fair, and I apologize.
My country has been at war everywhere for so long that I’m desensitized to it. What I wrote above was meant as an objective hypothetical, but was wildly insensitive.
I do not support war. I am just powerless to stop it, so it’s easier for me to speak insensitively about it, and I shouldn’t.
If I had any power whatsoever to stop this, I would.


The US couldn’t even beat the Houthis. I, for one, don’t feel like it’s time to be beating our chests.
There are consequences for putting legitimately incompetent people in charge.


Honestly, this feels like a good thing for democracy (or at least the illusion of a democracy we have in the US), in a roundabout way.
If the US military is stuck in an Iranian quagmire, it becomes harder to use it to terrorize citizens on the domestic front. I wish they’d send the donut eaters from ICE to the front.


Honestly gladdens me to know I’m not the only one who remembers this from 2017.


I still remember 2017, when Donald decided to drop the MOAB on Afghanistan and Fareed Zakaria praised him effusively on CNN.
Guess he learned the lesson.
Just wait until a few Iranian drones find their way into the US. Donald will love it, as historically, any attack on America has translated into Americans begging for authoritarians to become more authoritarian.